this is an excellent example of an "is-ought" fallacy.
your argument addresses the historical fact of land changing hands by force, it fails to address the moral implications of these actions
just because changes in land ownership have been predicated by violence for most of human history, does not mean they should still be
we must aim to be better
Tybbs
npub1xj…a3rqt
2025-02-04 20:59:56 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…yf4t
Author Public Key
npub1xjsenwf98zypvyu039f7v767cm3j8sc0jf55qd38x94nn2zw5x9ska3rqtSeen on
wss://nostr.momPublished at
2025-02-04 20:59:56 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "aacfa50b0645c6c923cf9a386391cff774a70fedb6c9ced0f55cb50e43f0b1bf",
"pubkey": "34a199b925388816138f8953e67b5ec6e323c30f9269403627316b39a84ea18b",
"created_at": 1738702796,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"92784ef7cd3b84cef2846a048c14f16873949e4fe4b8db3d81c50f196c35eb51",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"22d13c34a9fbf0ad1633ad53028c89ccad7ccda879596491d1348cc1216f01a1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"34a199b925388816138f8953e67b5ec6e323c30f9269403627316b39a84ea18b"
],
[
"p",
"ecf468164bd743b75683db3870ce01cb9a1d4b8ec203ed26de50f96255bbc75a"
]
],
"content": "this is an excellent example of an \"is-ought\" fallacy.\n\nyour argument addresses the historical fact of land changing hands by force, it fails to address the moral implications of these actions \n\njust because changes in land ownership have been predicated by violence for most of human history, does not mean they should still be\n\nwe must aim to be better ",
"sig": "aa7afb1dae4eb05850c7cc7279ee68b640ec3a4551842b656bcd37f358d6b78b420edaa67a0fd6bfe407a48bf23302dfeb8c04344ce428af028fd27889dfcc13"
}