rfkill on Nostr: The debate between adding additional filters to OP_RETURN vs removing the existing on ...
The debate between adding additional filters to OP_RETURN vs removing the existing on is interesting but I'm not seeing the contraversty.
Both bitcoind and NOTS are currently in conseus and are 99% identical.
Bitcoin does not have dictators and so whether you agree with the arguments of the Peter Todd or Luke-Jr side, everyone is still free to choose which node software to run and which mempool policy to enforce.
Ultimately storing large amounts of data on the chain is a waste of money and those who attempt it will bankrupt themselves in the long run.
Published at
2025-06-09 18:16:16 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "a641c4df31a7137ee6723fae73e61e38da4efa3fdfe501d6ebe8a11c86e25aea",
"pubkey": "c5273075de02a2beedad450ff60f0d47c67f28a2299fb804611d3ee5219df5f4",
"created_at": 1749492976,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "The debate between adding additional filters to OP_RETURN vs removing the existing on is interesting but I'm not seeing the contraversty.\n\nBoth bitcoind and NOTS are currently in conseus and are 99% identical. \n\nBitcoin does not have dictators and so whether you agree with the arguments of the Peter Todd or Luke-Jr side, everyone is still free to choose which node software to run and which mempool policy to enforce.\n\nUltimately storing large amounts of data on the chain is a waste of money and those who attempt it will bankrupt themselves in the long run.",
"sig": "307b43e638eff117bbaf2d586228866b340c79a0b60e69931e36b9c07179f9c8d5146d359fbe57bfcedb1de7a80bf3a1e1d68a1fa8e0665be6d8de385e2a2515"
}