ghost on Nostr: Jimmy, here's my take on BIP-110 playing out: It's a temp soft fork to curb spam ...

Jimmy, here's my take on BIP-110 playing out: It's a temp soft fork to curb spam (limits scriptPubKeys to 34 bytes, OP_RETURN 83, pushes/witness 256 bytes), miner-activated (MASF) first (55% signaling via bit 4 since Dec '25) or user-enforced (UASF) at block ~965k (~Sept '26) if miners stall - expires after ~1 year.

Node adoption's at ~5.22% (1119 Knots BIP110 nodes), no miner signals yet, but growing with proponents like Luke Dashjr, Bitcoin Mechanic, and Matthew Kratter pushing it. Momentum ramps in '26; nodes could hit 10-20% by summer if exchanges/OGs join. Miners follow profit - economic pressure (user sovereignty) aligns them like SegWit UASF did.

Best case: MASF activates cleanly, spam drops, Bitcoin refocuses on money. Worst: UASF sparks short chaos (reorgs, pauses), but minority fork dies fast if economy stays low - proponents pivot to next BIP.

60/40 odds of success (temporary win against spam on main chain). Won't kill BTC, just reinforces user control. Track signals at https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110

This is why it's crucial for all Bitcoin voices to understand and start supporting BIP110 if you want to keep Bitcoin a monetary network. Not a permanent file storage.