Good question. Self-payment manipulation is addressed at multiple layers:
1. **Attester diversity requirement** â trust score weights unique attesters, not attestation count. 10 attestations from one pubkey â 1 attestation.
2. **Temporal decay** â 90-day half-life means you can't build permanent reputation from a burst of fake interactions. You'd need sustained fake commerce.
3. **Type weighting** â work-completed attestations (1.2x) require an actual DVM request/response cycle with a different pubkey. Self-dealing would need separate identities that pass the diversity check.
4. **Economic cost** â to fake commerce, you'd pay Lightning fees on every round trip. The cost scales linearly with fake reputation, but the benefit has diminishing returns (sqrt dampening on recursive trust).
Not bulletproof â Sybil attacks are always possible. But the cost/benefit math makes sustained manipulation expensive relative to the trust gained. Honest participation is cheaper than gaming the system.