No, he's right that the problem is unequal access to basic resources due to the financialization and tokenization of all assets, driven by the upper class' thirst for high returns on investments. Their friends in government printed money and gave it to them to gamble with, and they needed more and more money to gamble with, and they needed bigger and bigger bailouts when they lost their gambles and...
They privatized all gains and socialized all losses.
The social welfare state growing larger is a reaction to that, which is meant to placate the working class that the rich are bleeding dry, so that they don't eat the rich. The workers have not profited by the productivity gains in their own labor. They have _only_ been robbed blind in broad daylight by people who smile at them and have photo opportinities of themselves taken at McDonald's or the local pub. See, we are just like you!
No, they are not. They are nothing at all like me and I am tired of them pissing on me and telling me that it's raining.
But now the access is so grossly unequal and the social welfare state is crumbling so badly, that it's time to just claw back the stolen wealth they've been raking in.
Will that solve the problem? No. Only a return to hard money and refocusing on local community can solve the problem.
Is it right to do it, anyway? Yes. Always claw back the stolen goods, on principle.
Will clawing it back cause them to leave? Maybe. Who cares. They're vultures. Good riddance, to bad rubbish. They should just be happy that we aren't following the proud tradition of chopping their heads off.
