NVK (npub1az9…m8y8) noob question. is there an equivalent for RFC 1918 for bitcoin addresses? ie to share UTXOs could we do NAT’s “hack” for IPv4 “to Bitcoin”?
If this has already been investigated, or this is what Lightning is, etc… I apologise for my poor understanding.
I’m conceptually thinking of a defined range of `bc1p…` addresses that represent private space, where a new, “local” address format can transact “off chain”
…maybe this idea is horseshit. IDK.
nevermind
npub15k…vyzre
2025-08-05 22:12:52 UTC
Author Public Key
npub15k4ulsvjns5wrc5xpv35yetfurjryaz98vgsmnrvxjan97ldt6rs5vyzreSeen on
wss://nos.lolPublished at
2025-08-05 22:12:52 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "4c7c336938e945407d66d7d5b569f9d450db1f32f12894f54524da9bcadd31b1",
"pubkey": "a5abcfc1929c28e1e2860b23426569e0e43274453b110dcc6c34bb32fbed5e87",
"created_at": 1754431972,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e88a691e98d9987c964521dff60025f60700378a4879180dcbbb4a5027850411"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 noob question. is there an equivalent for RFC 1918 for bitcoin addresses? ie to share UTXOs could we do NAT’s “hack” for IPv4 “to Bitcoin”? \n\nIf this has already been investigated, or this is what Lightning is, etc… I apologise for my poor understanding. \n\nI’m conceptually thinking of a defined range of `bc1p…` addresses that represent private space, where a new, “local” address format can transact “off chain”\n\n…maybe this idea is horseshit. IDK.",
"sig": "0eb2501293c9d3570f3308d708ef96ac1feb207c529932776c23b4ddd72e769c368efe66a4a397310d8f42da453c4e66f273e4914cd5e53b8b2a9f50e6833bd9"
}