dtonon on Nostr: Tools are fine, we already said that. But you still need a law to take action. So? ...

Tools are fine, we already said that.

But you still need a law to take action. So?
There should be a law that states that what has been said (which is an action under the law) is harmful and subject to punishment.

> notifies local allies or law enforcement **only if** the kid consents

I don't agree with this. Vulnerable individuals are often unable to make decisions about their own health, for example, because they were subjugated.

Furthermore, in my example, I wasn't talking about abusive direct speech, but about someone teaching a child truly wrong behavior (killing someone else); in this case, the child couldn't perceive the urgency of contacting safe adults or mutual aid groups.

We have to do distinctions, there is not black or white in human affairs.