Question and idea:
QC doesnt put bitcoins historical blockchain at risk right? So if someone creates an OTS proof they own the coins now (I.e. OTS stamping the hash of a signed txn that is never broadcasted), could there be a pathway for spending vulnerable coins post QC if they can produce an OTS proof that existed prior to QC?
Corey San Diego
npub1c0…zqs7w
2025-12-21 15:08:14 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…3njc
Author Public Key
npub1c0r3ytrr4afgrlhrhyec6y9wvkckdllx7ul3cfevtsgjqcrhx8tsdzqs7wPublished at
2025-12-21 15:08:14 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "227155c7ba5cd379637dc4342d352ecdddb47620939d77ab1a07e03f920667bc",
"pubkey": "c3c7122c63af5281fee3b9338d10ae65b166ffe6f73f1c272c5c1120607731d7",
"created_at": 1766329694,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: Question and idea:\n\nQC doesnt put bitcoins histori..."
],
[
"e",
"57acb960763dfbf08cef60376892d7b5041da3ead19237c42fa662a4add68a8a",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root",
"3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594"
],
[
"p",
"04c915daefee38317fa734444acee390a8269fe5810b2241e5e6dd343dfbecc9",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"p",
"04c915daefee38317fa734444acee390a8269fe5810b2241e5e6dd343dfbecc9",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"p",
"3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
]
],
"content": "Question and idea:\n\nQC doesnt put bitcoins historical blockchain at risk right? So if someone creates an OTS proof they own the coins now (I.e. OTS stamping the hash of a signed txn that is never broadcasted), could there be a pathway for spending vulnerable coins post QC if they can produce an OTS proof that existed prior to QC?",
"sig": "f5823deb25e8d9887332770a5b908060daaf621fabc4a107b44456dd73e5dcc252a4be39d0a0be2d147a8f761f86540a1749a0ce55e3d2553132201aac3bc8d6"
}