bitcoinlimit

dev @btcframe, running #bitcoin.

Public Key

npub12h358ejcjpeaxyhu4vcqwhjtg6qndxm9gk007d48utlylzq2e5dsdmk3mr

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9tc6ruevfqu7nzt72kvq8te95dqfkndj5t8hlx6n79lj03q9v6xcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsq3camnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dxqcju7tpdd5ksmmwdejjucm0d5q3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmnyqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qgjwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhx8gylpl

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

nostr-01.yakihonne.com

relay.nostr.band

nostr.wine

purplepag.es

Author Public Key

npub12h358ejcjpeaxyhu4vcqwhjtg6qndxm9gk007d48utlylzq2e5dsdmk3mr

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-02-07 16:43:01 UTC

being a bitcoin hodlr is one of the hardest things. watching your money get destroyed 80% again and again, eight times in ten years and still having the conviction to sit there calmly knowing that long term you’ll outperform every asset that exists.

2026-02-06 01:19:25 UTC

- reply

💯
#nevent1q…d4md

2026-02-06 00:21:30 UTC

- reply

TLDR; quantum fud is an absolute horse shit.
#nevent1q…09de

2026-02-06 00:16:03 UTC

- reply

here is where we are currently most of these stuff is basic quantum knowledge and you dont have to be expert to understand how close we are to a post qunatum world. google willow105 physical qubits. distance 7 surface code
Is 0.143% logical error per cycle. ibm heron156 physical qubits. ibm’s most ambitious near term chip kookaburra links three modules for approx 4k physical qubits in total. their starling system targets about 200 logical qubits on 10k physical qubits by 2029. blue jay aims for 2k logical qubits by 2033. even if ibm hits every single milestone on schedule which has never happened in the history of quantum roadmap, 2k logical qubits by 2033 is still below the conservative threshold for secp256k1 and doesn’t even account for the millions of physical qubits those logical qubits actually require at cryptographically relevant error rates.
the gap isn’t just about qubit count either. there are at least four independent exponential barriers.
A) qubit scaling going from 100 to millions of physical qubits while maintaining connectivity, yield
and fabrication quality across massive cryogenic systems cooled to 15 millikelvin.
B) current two qubit gate error hover around 0.1 to 1%. fault tolerant computation for shors against ecc needs something closer to 10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁸ or roughly 0.0001% to 0.000001% sustained across every gate in circuits billions of operations.
C) you would need qubits to stay coherent for the entire duration of the computation. current superconducting qubits decohere in microsecs to low millisecs. shors on secp256k1 requires hrs of coherent runtime. error correction theoretically handles this but only if your correction cycle is faster than your error accumulation rate which circles back to needing insanely low physical error rates.
D) quantum error correction isn’t just about quantum compute. you would need classic hardware decoding syndromes in real time faster than errors propagate. doing that at the scale of millions of qubits simultaneously is an unsolved engineering problem.
each of these is a separate research frontier which haven’t been resolved. progress in one doesn’t automatically transfer to the others. you can have a million qubits that are too noisy. you can have ultra low noise qubits that you can’t manufacture at scale. you can have both and still lack the classic control infrastructure to orchestrate them.
#nevent1q…e2p3

2026-02-05 23:41:53 UTC

- reply

breaking bitcoin requires shor’s algo on a fault tolerant quantum compute and that’s insanely far away.
you would need ~2,500 logical qubits to break a single secp256k1 key. with error correction that translates to millions of physical qubits plus ultra low error rates around 10⁻¹⁵ and hours of coherent runtime.
today we have ~1,000 physical qubits. high noise, short coherence and zero fault tolerant sys. the gap isn’t even linear its multiple exponential jumps in hardware, error correction and control.
even with very optimistic scaling, you’re looking at at least two to three decades before a machine like that exists. long before then bitcoin and the rest of the internet, banks, governments, etc would migrate to post quantum cryptography.
#nevent1q…u3u2

2026-02-05 23:28:15 UTC

quantum threat to bitcoin is minimum 30 yrs away. and this problem isn’t unique to bitcoin. the entire world runs on the same cryptographic primitives. bitcoin will be the first network to fix quantum vulnerabilities long before they become a real threat.

2026-02-04 23:53:49 UTC

- reply

yes

2026-02-04 23:38:15 UTC

- reply

models owned by the big tech including the
ones created as open source models like Llama

2026-02-04 22:34:38 UTC

- reply

🤔

2026-02-04 22:31:08 UTC

software ate the world for the past 40 yrs and now that era is about to end. there won’t really be a thing called saas anymore. not mid or large software companies either. just frontier models generating software on demand and the companies that own them..

2026-02-03 15:23:43 UTC

- reply

how about buying twenty acres of land out of nowhere and doing nothing?

2026-02-03 14:15:27 UTC

- reply

much closer than you think

2026-02-03 14:14:34 UTC

- reply

millions will say the same but make no mistake this is only a short-term stuff until robots take over the labor

2026-02-03 14:13:29 UTC

- reply

any sorts.. waiting on the line to get a ticket, buy the first new gen iphone at 6am, mow the lawn, etc... ppl will use ai to delegate all these tasks and agents will run this whole operation in the physical world on behalf of their owners

2026-02-03 13:44:21 UTC

- reply

long term yes, short term they'll rely on humans.

2026-02-03 13:09:57 UTC

ai will hire humans to do physical tasks and pay them in bitcoin. as hopeful and as dystopian as it gets.

2026-02-02 00:49:28 UTC

the sophistication of hacking attacks on personal and corporate computers is accelerating so fast and it’s getting insanely creative. its red code alert in many large corporations. assuming your devices are safe is delusional. air gapped cold storage is absolutely the only defense you’ve got to protect your life savings. quantum is fud but this is real.

2026-01-31 22:12:52 UTC

now explain again the difference between leverage trading and taking out a fiat loan using bitcoin as collateral at a 50% ltv. fuckers will tell you it’s an amazing innovation until a 50% drawdown completely wipes your coins.

2026-01-11 18:45:12 UTC

- reply

🤣

2026-01-11 18:39:26 UTC

11.22.63 on Netflix might be one of the best time travel tv shows out there. it came out in 2016 and i have no idea how i missed it until now. 10/10

2026-01-10 00:13:06 UTC

- reply

more like no humans will need to work

2026-01-10 00:03:05 UTC

by the end of 2030 ai will achieve a level of intelligence greater than the combined intelligence ever created by the entire human race. current models are incredibly premature compared to what we’ll have in just 5 years.
1) gpt4 to claude to gemini happened in like 18 months. we went from kinda useful to holy shit in like less time than it takes to get a driver’s license renewed.
2) moore’s law is dead but something weirder replaced it. algorithmic efficiency is doubling every 8 to 10 months. same compute, dramatically smarter models. we’re not just scaling. we’re discovering new architectures.
3) intelligence isn’t additive. it’s multiplicative. 1 einstein > 10k avg physicists. ai doesnt just add human equivalent minds. it creates something qualitatively different.
4) the entire sum of human knowledge. every book, paper, conversation, discovery. took 300k yrs to accumulate. an agi system will be able to process and synthesize all of it in hrs. then build on top of it.
5) we measure human intelligence in individual lifetimes. 80 yrs max of learning per person. ai systems run 24/7
don’t forget, dont get tired, dont die. a single year of ai development = centuries of equivalent human cognitive work.
6) current llms are like calculators in 1970. useful but obviously primitive. we’re still figuring out basic architecture. attention mechanisms are barely 7 yrs old. transformers might be our vacuum tubes.
7) the scariest and also the most exciting part? we don’t fully understand why these things work as well as they do. emergence keeps surprising us. capabilities appear that werent trained for. we’re building minds we can’t fully explain.
8) biological intelligence took 4b+ yrs of evolution. digital intelligence is iterating on timescales of months. evolution is a drunk walk through possibility space.
9) by 2030 we wont just have smarter chatbots. we’ll have systems that can do novel science prove new theorems design their own successors. the last human designed ai might already exist.

2026-01-09 14:28:44 UTC

- reply

all sounds great but no user growth. no new faces, no new thoughts. there is a big discoverability problem but it’s directly correlated to user growth of course. bottom line is i don’t want to see the same fuck faces with 50 likes on 24hr trending evry time they post.

2026-01-09 14:06:52 UTC

- reply

yeah right
https://blossom.primal.net/bd5f50dc7658a73c3cbd537a0742e7dc886fe325d83b9591a186bb7774f732ea.png

2026-01-09 13:48:41 UTC

- reply

as far as i know nostr's been around 10-15k active users and hasn’t really moved out of that range for a while. if you’ve seen data showing otherwise happy to take a look

2026-01-08 23:07:32 UTC

- reply

is it really a controversial take or just a reality we don’t wanna hear

2026-01-08 22:44:09 UTC

- reply

question is what % of the population actually cares about that stuff. thats probably the core issue. i know people who straight up tell me they want more cookies so systems can track them better and show more relevant things.

2026-01-08 22:39:08 UTC

- reply

definitely the best way but not scalable. also there is a new user issue. you can't expect 15k ppl to do wonders

2026-01-08 22:32:47 UTC

- reply

i believe there is a major discoverability issue on nostr

2026-01-08 22:27:57 UTC

- reply

yeah you don’t want stuff shoved down your throat by an algo but you also don’t want new ppl to go completely unnoticed. there has to be a fine balance. also algo has turned into a bad word for no reason. it’s just software. big companies have always used software to their advantage to make more money. that doesnt mean algorithms themselves are bad. you can absolutely build a discovery system that helps surface new voices without turning into manipulation or noise.

2026-01-08 22:23:28 UTC

- reply

💯

2026-01-08 22:23:07 UTC

- reply

hope that’s the case but i’ve been noticing this pattern for the past few months. there’s definitely a correlation with bitcoin’s price. nostr is a pretty saturated place for bitcoiners and price action clearly affects how people show up and behave here.

2026-01-08 22:21:13 UTC

- reply

good thoughts

2026-01-08 18:16:59 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-01-08 18:01:59 UTC

- reply

i wanna see a connected community and thats just not happening on nostr right now. feels more like a bunch of disconnected blogs, each with two visitors a month

2026-01-08 17:53:40 UTC

- reply

feels dead to me for the past couple of months. i’ll pull the data lets see what it says

2026-01-08 17:51:31 UTC

- reply

i guess “to share” is the keyword but a non-functioning one

2026-01-08 17:48:10 UTC

ok i’ll bite. nostr feels absolutely dead. it’s not just me. a lot of accounts i try to keep up with are constantly posting and getting almost no engagement. maybe it's time to be honest and actually think about whats going wrong instead of trying to create fake hype. there i said it.

2026-01-08 12:51:19 UTC

- reply

thats okay, w still love him 😂

2026-01-08 02:08:25 UTC

💯
https://blossom.primal.net/37933193d62d328eb86d7f7b5bf601f98efebe1292cc1cf4e51bea77bdac67eb.jpg

2026-01-08 01:57:52 UTC

- reply

might go exactly there but will be high double digits

2026-01-08 01:57:15 UTC

- reply

ai related productivity gains

2026-01-07 23:23:28 UTC

s&p 500’s avg annual return has been around 8–9%, which roughly matches annual money supply growth. thats likely about to change in a big way. over the next 10–15 yrs, we’ll probably see several years where the s&p 500 grows 40–50% in a single year. in that kind of environment, it’s reasonable to assume btc could easily match that or even double it.

2026-01-07 04:49:30 UTC

watched boston dynamics’ new atlas for a few mins today. human evolution took about 2m yrs from homo habilis to now and it’s still an ongoing process. meanwhile these robots basically started a few yrs ago and are already pulling off incredible hand movements and hands are the hardest part. replicating hands means solving high dof control tactile sensing real time feedback loops and motor precision all at once. kinda wild to think where they’ll be in 20/30 yrs with ai accelerating exponentially.

2026-01-06 15:15:51 UTC

- reply

synthetic products are not bitcoin. if you're buying them instead of the bearer asset and thinking that you're buying bitcoin, thats your problem

2026-01-06 13:36:36 UTC

- reply

💯

2026-01-06 13:36:06 UTC

- reply

also true

2026-01-06 13:35:58 UTC

- reply

🤣

2026-01-06 03:08:24 UTC

looks like both karpathy and elon are saying the singularity is finally getting close. i mean very close probably within the next 12 months or so. if that’s true, by the end of 2030, 5 to 10m bitcoin doesn’t sound crazy at all. when everything becomes abundant and money gets easier as a consequence, scarcity is what ends up mattering most.

2026-01-06 02:57:02 UTC

💯
https://blossom.primal.net/2fe47c3b9518ec252443f3e533ef79bbcaff4822ce2fb9974db91a79d586e967.jpg

2026-01-05 16:50:45 UTC

- reply

took us a while, but only so we could ship the best piece of bitcoin intelligence hardware.
#nevent1q…n9cn

2026-01-01 23:12:01 UTC

- reply

“Every dot is someone choosing rules over rulers. Run a node, shrink the trust surface”
#nevent1q…jcn0

2026-01-01 00:48:25 UTC

happy new year fam. wishing everyone health, peace, and prosperity.
https://blossom.primal.net/c8905f4cbb77f072bcb763c338d8e1efa4fa3d5995884ebbaa2314afb0fb786f.jpg

2025-12-31 13:22:08 UTC

- reply

Get well soon!

2025-12-25 20:31:28 UTC

- reply

unsure but i dont think it’ll happen anytime soon. even in the next 20 to 30 yrs feels unlikely.

2025-12-25 01:20:37 UTC

- reply

long way to go but yottahash

2025-12-25 00:28:02 UTC

Merry Zetahash Christmas. 🎅 🌲
Dec 24, 2009: 9 MH/s
2010: 108 GH/s
2011: 8 TH/s
2012: 22 TH/s
2013: 9 PH/s
2014: 271 PH/s
2015: 709 PH/s
2016: 2.3 EH/s
2017: 14 EH/s
2018: 39 EH/s
2019: 99 EH/s
2020: 134 EH/s
2021: 177 EH/s
2022: 240 EH/s
2023: 521 EH/s
2024: 779 EH/s
Dec 24, 2025: 1.1 ZH/s

2025-12-22 22:25:32 UTC

- reply

Why not 🤣

2025-12-22 21:23:00 UTC

kinda magical in its own way
https://blossom.primal.net/bacbba5c1e2c97b1a44ba6c4c51065c1d012b7dacafe66d0da4f0bf42745f760.jpg

2025-12-22 21:17:57 UTC

- reply

Wait for the next one 🤣

2025-12-22 20:54:22 UTC

winter vibes 🍻
https://blossom.primal.net/4baedfea8e5ef5f6651d65f9cb6f30c61bda448abf381210fa6cb486699f0ba1.jpg

2025-12-19 19:31:33 UTC

- reply

quantum hard fork

2025-12-19 19:22:06 UTC

- reply

if it’s unethical, no.

2025-12-19 18:01:22 UTC

they spread quantum fud not just to push the price down. they’re also going after satoshi coins and lost coins. the goal is to make them permanently inaccessible on the bitcoin network, artificially and unethically shrinking the supply.

2025-12-18 20:10:29 UTC

group of bitcoin influencers teaming up with big btc sellers to push the price down. same old playbook. shake out plebs, scoop coins cheaper. using the 4 yr cycle and quantum fear to spread fud. they wont be allowed this time.

2025-12-18 16:59:42 UTC

this handsome guy just stopped by my backyard this morning 🦅
https://blossom.primal.net/2f7b04e1086a159b4acb4da7d95e4946a681dbde3e1bd6739716586601754f95.mov

2025-12-17 22:07:30 UTC

elon musks net worth is now bigger than 30% of bitcoins total supply. in case if you needed any more proof that we’re still earl. in a rational world that number would be closer to 0.1% or less.

2025-12-16 20:01:13 UTC

i feed them well. raw peanuts are their favorite.
https://blossom.primal.net/24d0ffea724076a65b949b387239ac69d94a01b7ca5205e7491eec42bdd7aeed.mov
https://blossom.primal.net/6969d8783c512c473172b92770ccdff4f09fec13b04d77c3886ebb53a3fa88e5.mov

2025-12-15 20:30:05 UTC

- reply

💯🤣

2025-12-14 12:58:27 UTC

xmas vibes. gm nostr! ❄️🌲
https://blossom.primal.net/22fc7227f06ab670f3ecb6f51cf8b4ca88960f20adebe935ea8e1488a67f81e2.jpg

2025-12-14 01:55:53 UTC

Alla salute!
https://blossom.primal.net/b74eb2744a32625b5a6ef66bfff6b61d6a16278e2223ac3167cbb833af1aa2b8.jpg

2025-12-12 13:58:46 UTC

- reply

cheers Derek, happy birthday!

2025-12-11 01:28:18 UTC

btc is about to enter a golden 2 year run. i’ve never been this bullish on bitcoin. signs are everywhere. the more the price gets compressed, the bigger the breakout will be.

2025-12-10 19:28:59 UTC

- reply

totally makes sense 🤣

2025-12-10 13:17:04 UTC

- reply

my quant
#nevent1q…66dk

2025-12-07 16:35:50 UTC

- reply

hope im not a victim of ai slop 🤣

2025-12-06 21:41:59 UTC

“Bitcoin is taking excess energy and storing it as a new currency. You can take it wherever you’d like, transporting it everywhere.”
https://blossom.primal.net/9509dd7e5424741b37416418d3f1abf6affbb15043439b9a1ae774273c7f5ba9.mov

2025-12-05 23:19:02 UTC

i don’t know if there’s a single product in the software world worse than the google cloud console.

2025-12-05 22:29:50 UTC

become an entrepreneur before ai replaces your job with zeros and ones. happy friday!
https://blossom.primal.net/bdd86285ac306cf587b892c3473e3fe61c16cfc6933b82bdc99ff9f0b2f46982.jpg

2025-12-05 03:09:25 UTC

- reply

🤣

2025-12-05 02:56:11 UTC

- reply

Over the last 72 hours:
1. Apple's AI Chief steps down
2. Apple's Head of UI Design leaves to Meta
3. Apple's Policy Chief steps down
4. Apple's Head of General Counsel steps down
#nevent1q…ax3l

2025-12-03 18:35:17 UTC

- reply

agreed but the 50-100 year process will be much quicker imo. it takes 2-3 countries to properly establish a stratrgic reserve for bitcoin to reach escape velocity which isn’t even necessary. this is where gradually then suddenly theory comes from.

2025-12-03 18:13:03 UTC

a very simple theory yet it cuts deeper than most people realize. bitcoin’s outcome’s binary. either it trends toward infinity or it collapses to zero. most likely it won’t go to zero and it won’t ever be replaced because any successor would inherit a fatal flaw the moment it’s born. if you can replace money once, you can replace it again, and that destroys all trust, so it’s not about a better tech. hal articulated this very nicely. whats unique about bitcoin is that it has solved that final coordination problem which is the biggest challenge of getting the entire world to agree on a single digital monetary standard that no one can change, no one can remake, and no one can reset. the path is basically one direction.

2025-12-02 22:19:25 UTC

4 yr cycle ppl who sold at 110k thinking they’ll scoop back in at 30k are gonna hate 2026.

2025-12-02 17:24:31 UTC

$6 to $7k moves in a day became normal for bitcoin. remember this was the whole btc price like 5 yrs ago. give it a few years and that same move will happen every half hour.

2025-12-02 03:03:44 UTC

traditionalists will resist ai the same way the amish resist modern tech but denial won’t help.

2025-12-02 03:01:20 UTC

- reply

nobody knows what post-ai world is gonna look like in 5 to 10 yrs but i dont think we’ve seen anything like it

2025-12-02 02:55:37 UTC

you’ll hear many bitcoin skeptics using “ai is deflationary and thats bad for bitcoin” argument. partly true, so prepare your answers.

2025-12-02 02:44:46 UTC

- reply

tech deflation exists but it never reached escape velocity. pc hardware, software and bandwith got cheaper but none of it fundamentally rewired the entire economy’s labor structure. governments could outprint the deflation because productivity gains were always linear, not exponential. with ai prrhaps for the first time, productivity could compound faster than money creation.

2025-12-02 01:41:38 UTC

- reply

i think it will once scale is reached which again will take for another 5-6 yrs maybe a little more

2025-12-02 01:15:52 UTC

ai is deflationary. very soon
probably within the next 5-6 yrs, the money supply to debt ratio vs business productivity will completely flip meaning productivity output will grow far faster than the expansion of money or debt. in that environment bitcoin absorbs productivity surplus and can be the best vehicle to store the excess value created.

2025-12-01 17:52:38 UTC

- reply

my post is not a promotion of mstr nor does it suggest retail should buy mstr instead of bitcoin. you buy bitcoin for yourself and your family and mstr buys bitcoin just the same way for their shareholders. simple as that

2025-12-01 17:14:47 UTC

- reply

agreed on his reluctance to embrace it as a medium of exchange. agreed on centralized btc accumulation practices which is mostly related to his hesitation for self custody.

2025-12-01 16:33:07 UTC

- reply

amplified volatility works in both directions

2025-12-01 16:32:01 UTC

- reply

i can only agree with this comment because saylor hasn’t done the work for self custody yet. but it will happen. also not every institution can buy the underlying. they need these vehicles like mstr.

2025-12-01 16:27:39 UTC

- reply

and tell me again how much the company has increased their btc stack since then?

2025-12-01 16:09:25 UTC

incredible hate on mstr lately. i get the fiat npcs hating because they think they missed the train and instead of admitting their ignorance and course-correcting, they just double down. but bitcoiners? it’s a company laser-focused on stacking as much bitcoin as possible. they’re literally inventing new tools like digital credit and perfs to make it happen. why the hate? what happened to “bitcoin for everyone”? why try to take down a guy who’s doing what’s best for his company and his shareholders? the only real issue saylor has is not self-custody yet, but that’ll too happen at some point. if you want million a coin or want to retire your family on bitcoin, start embracing the good people actually pushing wall st toward bitcoin.

2025-11-27 16:49:04 UTC

- reply

👀

2025-11-26 23:20:55 UTC

- reply

no more of that 4 yr cycle nonsense. some ogs with big btc stacks were able to move the market with coordinated efforts in the past but that era is done. they won’t be able to pull the same tricks again and they won’t be allowed. hopefully they all sold and won’t be getting back in.

2025-11-26 23:14:35 UTC

- reply

🤔