Tauri

https://www.goldgraphy.org

Not a Founder or a CEO of anything.

Public Key

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrzsrjc9h6jse7zd60vtjmqtypvw2xa55c48x78v25z5fu98gellcppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kueg7t2xwp

Publishing to

nostr.mom

nostr.wine

Author Public Key

npub1x9q89st049pnuym57ch9kqkgzcu5dmff32wduwc4g9gnc2w3nlls8hcsg7

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-04 12:41:51 UTC

Stolen from @nprofile…5zl8 😂👌
cc: @npub1qny…95gx
https://blossom.primal.net/14ca1d112a25f400fff0618481e493c5bdbd8a65e91e157212c6c2b315803357.jpg

2026-03-04 12:22:11 UTC

- reply

People are so deranged and confused about the spam issue they don’t even bother to think through what they’re getting upset about. It’s all so stupid and tiresome.
#nevent1q…yl9u

2026-02-21 07:41:12 UTC

- reply

Do you still think Bitcoin works like democracy? 🤔

2026-02-17 10:40:00 UTC

Plebs running nodes is what GIVES bitcoin any VALUE.
https://blossom.primal.net/d885c63de94f4f9834bcb053dcd7ddb34597c0fcf3b6dc8bfff1789cf70d4b9e.jpg

2026-02-16 11:25:21 UTC

- reply

I was gonna say the same thing.

2026-02-10 18:33:16 UTC

- reply

Bro go fuck yourself

2026-02-10 18:32:41 UTC

- reply

Love when the good guys stop pulling their punches. No point in being civil and respectful with clowns. 😌
#nevent1q…33kq

2026-02-09 22:47:47 UTC

- reply

I asked you what you see on the picture and you hung on the text and started explaining basic stuff. How about taking a deeper look and apply some common logic?

2026-02-09 21:17:36 UTC

#BIP110 derangement syndrome.
https://blossom.primal.net/98cb43dbe026f78a5aac5b4573ea319607596bf05f4d1cf7bdd9e5254eaf5a46.jpg

2026-02-09 15:16:07 UTC

- reply

Dad guided by his children tells you everything you need to know. 🤦‍♂️
https://blossom.primal.net/bc5b390b3da74e3e57660cbe08e9014677134829d445b31c4c1cff39ee648835.jpg

2026-02-09 08:38:17 UTC

What’s the best place to visit in Germany for a 3-day trip?
I’ve been to Munich + Oberammergau twice, and it was great. Looking for something similar.
#asknostr

2026-02-08 17:05:04 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…amkl @nprofile…zelk photography and art

2026-02-08 17:03:35 UTC

- reply

🤢
https://blossom.primal.net/1c9d204d981fb33432b1939e09c79a54af108463f10ac3552a6b95ad6a7f0acd.png
#nevent1q…vwl6

2026-02-08 15:51:28 UTC

- reply

Why do you want to waste his time? Absolutely retarded presentation that didn’t even mention what BIP110 actually does.
https://youtu.be/JGjD-il29_M

2026-02-08 11:46:34 UTC

- reply

If the management is corrupt, the management must go. It’s not like we’re removing the pope, although maybe we should 🤔

2026-02-08 11:07:22 UTC

- reply

This is completely wrong. Spending creates an entire new cohort of adopters: merchants. At some point merchants start onboarding other merchants (like holders onboard other holders). They buy and hold like you do, and create additional demand for new participants, especially if they demand bitcoin, instead of fiat. This is a very rookie take.

2026-02-08 10:56:17 UTC

- reply

> Can anyone assuage some of the concerns in this post?
If you mean the concern trolling in this post, I’ll give it a try. It’s a long post but of very small substance.
What this guy misses is that #BIP110 is not an improvement protocol in the traditional sense. Normally, a BIP exists to optimize or expand a feature that is already functioning as intended. That is not what BIP110 is trying to do. BIP110 is attempting to correct behaviors that undermine long-standing design assumptions of Bitcoin. It is less about adding functionality and more about preserving the conditions that allow Bitcoin to function as sovereign, verifiable money. The real risk here is not stagnation, it is gradual drift in protocol norms and network culture that quietly changes what Bitcoin is optimized for.
The argument that BIP110 does not improve Bitcoin’s moneyness misses a lot of nuances. Money derives its strength from reliability, predictability, and broad verification accessibility. Monetary premium depends heavily on trust minimization and the ability for individuals to independently verify the ledger. When the network begins incentivizing large amounts of arbitrary data storage, it introduces new costs and new legal and operational attack surfaces that are unrelated to monetary settlement. Historically, the strongest forms of money are those that remain narrowly focused on settlement rather than attempting to serve as multipurpose infrastructure. Gold maintained monetary dominance not because it was the most versatile metal, but because its primary function remained monetary settlement. Bitcoin’s value proposition follows a similar logic.
The stenography defense also ignores the incentive asymmetry being created. When actors can embed large volumes of arbitrary data at minimal cost, node operators become involuntary custodians of that data indefinitely. The economic burden of long-term storage and validation is socialized across the network, while the economic upside is captured privately by those monetizing inscriptions, rare sats, or similar mechanisms. Bitcoin’s fee market is supposed to align cost with resource consumption. When that alignment weakens, the result is gradual pressure toward node centralization and higher barriers to independent verification. That is not a theoretical concern, in fact it strikes directly at Bitcoin’s core security model.
There is also a practical operational impact. Excess arbitrary data competes for blockspace and validation resources that would otherwise serve monetary settlement. Over time, this degrades node efficiency and increases the hardware and bandwidth requirements required to fully participate in the network. Bitcoin’s resilience depends on keeping verification cheap and widely distributed. Every increase in baseline validation cost moves the system slightly closer to reliance on specialized infrastructure.
The claims regarding mining decentralization and Libre Relay are naively misplaced. Mining centralization is primarily driven by reward distribution models like FPPS, which concentrate risk management and capital requirements inside large pools. Mempool policy tightening does not create this centralization dynamic. If anything, reducing externalities in block construction can help align incentives more closely with efficient transaction selection. Solutions like DATUM directly target mining centralization by reducing reliance on centralized block template construction and enabling miners to participate more independently. That addresses the actual structural cause rather than peripheral symptoms.
The points raised about Cashu and OP_SUCCESS also miss the broader prioritization question. Cashu introduces alternative trust tradeoffs that may improve convenience or privacy in specific contexts, but it does not fundamentally expand Bitcoin’s core settlement guarantees beyond what layered solutions like Lightning already provide. OP_SUCCESS may enable certain specialized use cases, such as inheritance mechanisms, but those applications remain niche and can be implemented through other mechanisms without expanding the base layer’s attack surface. Bitcoin’s base layer has historically erred on the side of minimalism precisely because every opcode and every feature becomes a permanent consensus commitment with unpredictable long-term consequences.
Every capability targeted by BIP110 represents either a demonstrated or plausible vector for resource externalization and protocol abuse. When systemic abuse is tolerated, the network becomes harder to verify, more expensive to operate, and more vulnerable to regulatory and infrastructure capture. Meaningful innovation is difficult to build on top of a deteriorating base layer. BIP110 attempts to stabilize that foundation by tightening rules that reinforce Bitcoin’s original security and incentive model.

2026-02-08 10:02:41 UTC

- reply

It will become permanent. The one year period is like a trial period. To test if everything works and to give the broad community time to work out the details of the permanent solution.

2026-02-08 09:56:48 UTC

- reply

> and those who support BIP110 have lost their way.
This is the only part where I disagree. Supporters of #BIP110 represent a group of Bitcoiners focused on preserving Bitcoin’s core principles. It’s far from clear that Monero, if placed in Bitcoin’s position - under the full scrutiny of governments, TradFi institutions, and mass normie adoption - would handle that level of pressure as well. Given that level of pressure, Bitcoin has held up surprisingly well.

2026-02-08 09:12:06 UTC

Beef jerky = child meat 😨
https://youtu.be/7JVNfUnvF_c

2026-02-07 21:32:23 UTC

- reply

Why shadowy super coder is useless 🤔

2026-02-07 20:45:46 UTC

- reply

We don’t need him at this point

2026-02-07 15:45:51 UTC

- reply

As far as I know some trackers count recently upgraded nodes twice for some reason before this gets fixed a day or two later.

2026-02-07 15:40:06 UTC

- reply

Nature is healing.

2026-02-07 15:08:09 UTC

- reply

If most of the network signals for bip110 there’s not really a point to run a URSF. That’s why minority soft forks usually work. Not signalling doesn’t mean opposing. If you watched the video, you’d understand this.

2026-02-07 15:04:39 UTC

- reply

No idea but it’s hilarious

2026-02-07 09:37:28 UTC

- reply

This is what AI was always about 🤣
#nevent1q…vxne

2026-02-07 09:30:32 UTC

- reply

I’d imagine being the plaything of an old pederast is worse.

2026-02-07 09:28:46 UTC

- reply

Or just being a broke ass nigga. Like his fake fight with that YouTuber loser.

2026-02-07 09:25:17 UTC

- reply

The Epstein files confirmed this. We’re slaves. The question is what are we going to do now that we know. Do we rebel and free ourselves? Or do we cope and accept? Seeing how many people say nothing in these files is surprising, new or disturbing, makes me wonder.

2026-02-07 09:14:53 UTC

- reply

Are you funding Palestinians with your bitcoin then?

2026-02-07 09:13:54 UTC

- reply

Are they running a URSF? If not, they’re not really against.

2026-02-07 09:12:54 UTC

- reply

🤦‍♂️

2026-02-07 09:12:24 UTC

- reply

And what is your take on IDF soldiers?

2026-02-06 23:15:03 UTC

- reply

Interesting. Basically tied.

2026-02-06 23:11:03 UTC

- reply

Just watch the damn video instead of looking for quick answers.

2026-02-06 23:10:08 UTC

- reply

> What miners support BIP110?
What exchanges?
What miners/exchanges are against it? Give it time.

2026-02-06 23:08:09 UTC

- reply

Over 6% of nodes signal and it’s been barely a week. Mechanic could as well be wrong but he’s right about that BIP148 had even less support than BIP110 and miners went on with it eventually, despite being opposed to it. Nodes signal, miners follow. If it was the opposite, Bcashers would have been right and we would have been poorer instead like they are. Also being this certain in any outcome at this point is a blind spot. I think I have a decent understanding of the game theory at play here and even that can’t give me full confidence that I’m right. So many things might happen until August.
https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110

2026-02-06 22:59:19 UTC

- reply

It’s correct on the surface level logic but fails when add additional nuances.

2026-02-06 22:56:39 UTC

- reply

👊

2026-02-06 22:54:57 UTC

- reply

Forget the ai. It has been fed all the wrong data points and we have the changed narrative post SegWit. Just watch the entire video and thank me later if your perspective changes.

2026-02-06 22:51:27 UTC

- reply

This was not a capitulation. It was derivatives clearing leveraged players. Larry Fink ain’t a fan of those and he’s not trying to hide it. It’s why we had no explosive bull and why we will have shallow bear with violent pukes but very quick recoveries. Thanks paper bitcoin schemes.

2026-02-06 22:45:06 UTC

- reply

Your gut instinct is understandable, but it’s wrong nevertheless. I think you need to watch this video asap:
https://youtu.be/-a-GwIZmoOM

2026-02-06 22:42:46 UTC

- reply

Peter Toad has been very diligent in this regard. You can almost admire the low time preference of his malicious work.

2026-02-06 22:40:48 UTC

- reply

This 🎯
#nevent1q…ur5p

2026-02-06 22:38:26 UTC

- reply

The American dream is not what it used to be. 🙄

2026-02-06 22:36:40 UTC

- reply

At this point is nearly certain that BIP110 will activate. There’s a pretty decent chance that it will be a success due to historical precedent and the asymmetric risk for miners not going on with it.

2026-02-06 22:30:41 UTC

- reply

The lead maintainers of any Bitcoin client with meaningful network adoption are a potential single point of failure. That applies to Core just as much as it applies to Knots.
Right now, identifying bad actors feels straightforward because some have exposed themselves through their conduct over the past few years. That clarity shouldn’t be assumed to last.
Adversaries evolve, learn from mistakes, and become harder to detect. The ecosystem has to evolve with the same level of vigilance and adaptability.
#nevent1q…x2tt

2026-02-06 22:21:03 UTC

- reply

True. Thanks to Shibe for making this clear:
#nevent1q…hmtv

2026-02-06 22:20:09 UTC

- reply

Thanks for pointing this out. I’ve missed this.

2026-02-06 22:17:50 UTC

- reply

One of those limits was the op_return filter that was in place for more than 10 years. Following with your logic, the removal of this limit disrupted the market, rather than make it more fair. The proposal aims to return to the old logic that has worked flawlessly for most of the Bitcoin’s history and that ended up being changed by the hand of 5 people, against the wishes of the network. Your stance is noble, but misplaced.

2026-02-06 22:11:33 UTC

- reply

Preventing abuse of the protocol is not censorship ffs 🤦‍♂️

2026-02-06 22:09:37 UTC

- reply

Tbh this is the first sensible argument vs BIP110 I’ve seen so far. Anyone got an idea if this has been accounted for in the BIP? Has Dathon addressed this @nprofile…ljrg?
#nevent1q…0u4r

2026-02-06 22:01:29 UTC

- reply

The fork is a solution to a problem created by malicious/compromised devs. Up until now this was only a theoretical scenario. People were largely convinced that devs can’t change bitcoin because of the way the system works. This was proven untrue with the release of Core v30. This fork is the manifestation of the natural immune system of Bitcoin we all instinctively knew it would be triggered in the case of attack. The success of the fork will reinforce the notion that Bitcoin’s immune system is working as intended and the network remains anti-fragile. If it fails, it will prove what many bitcoin critics have claimed over the years: that the lead dev team is a single point of failure. To me this is a huge cause for concern and I assume it could be the same for many other large holders of Bitcoin.

2026-02-06 21:42:40 UTC

- reply

I’d assume he just read what Greg Maxwell posted on the mailing list and went with a gut feeling.

2026-02-06 21:35:48 UTC

- reply

These are not serious people but they have serious following of brain dead bitcoiners.

2026-02-06 21:27:24 UTC

- reply

People that would use Bitcoin to fund war missed the point completely. 🤦‍♂️
#nevent1q…hcpf

2026-02-06 21:24:48 UTC

- reply

Your grandfather was wise.

2026-02-06 21:21:35 UTC

- reply

Ofc it matters, it just doesn’t bother me at all. 🤷‍♂️

2026-02-06 21:14:56 UTC

- reply

It made you look like a Latino 😅

2026-02-06 21:10:06 UTC

- reply

🎯

2026-02-06 21:07:59 UTC

- reply

Which is?

2026-02-06 21:06:25 UTC

- reply

Read the post again

2026-02-06 21:02:16 UTC

- reply

Core’s reputation is not deteriorated in the eyes of serious people? Did I read that right? Are all people employed at BM completely retarded?
#nevent1q…zdmq

2026-02-06 17:39:06 UTC

- reply

I’m not worried

2026-02-06 15:06:19 UTC

- reply

Well here’s another video that might change your perspective on this. If it doesn’t and BIP110 succeeds, try to remember this was pointed out to you.
#nevent1q…y6fg

2026-02-06 13:19:37 UTC

- reply

> a hard fork that completely changes the monetary policy of ethereum is not the same as a non-fork.
Never said it is, read the post again.
> plus, nobody cares. behavior on chain exactly the same as it was before.
Over 5000 knots node runners and over 1500 BIP110 node runners respectfully disagree.
> slop_return was a nothing burger. continuing to be outraged is your choice.
You seem more outraged than me.

2026-02-06 13:15:53 UTC

- reply

Did he return you the lost sats?

2026-02-06 12:48:38 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…xexz

2026-02-06 12:30:17 UTC

- reply

Same for me. I just imagine how boomers might feel when they see this. Personally I feel nothing.

2026-02-06 11:10:54 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:52:24 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:52:01 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:51:00 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:50:41 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:48:52 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:47:44 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nkrx

2026-02-06 10:40:25 UTC

- reply

Oh I’m sure already. The current governance system is broken beyond repair.

2026-02-06 10:38:51 UTC

Remember Ethereum moving to PoS?
Same vibe.
https://blossom.primal.net/ed9e328ea79c85abaabab2cfad91646506b47d275391af3103b862f7f4157acc.jpg

2026-02-06 10:18:52 UTC

- reply

At least wait for 58k. The gang is waiting.

2026-02-06 10:17:44 UTC

- reply

Yes. Now the rest of the shitcoiners need to go as well.
https://blossom.primal.net/45cfd759d8b643b6b50267dc60a94f3646b4d8f54a56b75422d6563464d4102c.gif

2026-02-06 10:16:13 UTC

- reply

Nothing is inevitable, not even Bitcoin. That’s the fallacy that we were led to believe.

2026-02-06 09:54:36 UTC

Not running #BIP110 doesn’t mean you’re against it.
Few.

2026-02-06 09:44:14 UTC

- reply

When does the single drop? 🤙

2026-02-06 09:37:43 UTC

- reply

BIP110 does exactly the opposite.
#nevent1q…y6fg

2026-02-06 09:36:38 UTC

- reply

Then you should love BIP110. That is if you’re honest.

2026-02-06 09:35:39 UTC

- reply

Segwit was contentious too. Miners and Core were against it. We got lightning out of it.

2026-02-06 09:34:20 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…y6fg

2026-02-06 09:33:19 UTC

- reply

Using and abusing are not the same thing.

2026-02-06 06:45:56 UTC

- reply

Where are you guys? 🤔
#nevent1q…f3x9

2026-02-06 06:43:58 UTC

- reply

They’re not used to stocks puking 10k a day and most of them treat bitcoin as a tech stock.

2026-02-05 20:52:13 UTC

- reply

I feel nothing

2026-02-05 20:27:08 UTC

I bet boomers are pissing themselves right now. 😂

2026-02-05 20:23:42 UTC

- reply

At least he tried.

2026-02-05 20:23:04 UTC

- reply

I’ll be stacking when it makes more sense.

2026-02-05 20:19:34 UTC

Here, I fixed the pyramid from Tone’s presentation.
Actors are listed by order of importance.
https://blossom.primal.net/377d4c9d3c8852bc0c73c8650630366028dde7a87983f98fba4f63d30e02136d.png

2026-02-05 19:56:20 UTC

- reply

Too early

2026-02-05 19:55:47 UTC

- reply

Looks pretty good

2026-02-05 19:52:55 UTC

- reply

Money without a network effect is not money. Maybe a collectible at best.

2026-02-05 19:51:41 UTC

- reply

Finally.
https://blossom.primal.net/45cfd759d8b643b6b50267dc60a94f3646b4d8f54a56b75422d6563464d4102c.gif