LynAlden
Lyn Alden

https://www.lynalden.com/

Founder of Lyn Alden Investment Strategy. Partner at Ego Death Capital. Finance/Engineering blended background.

Public Key

npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3qamnwvaz7tm4wvh8ycnj9e3xjmcpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43qzxnhwden5te0w35x2en0wfjhxapwdehhxarjxyhxxmmdqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtntv9khqtnnd96x2npahda

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-01-31 23:08:23 UTC

- reply

Plot twist: they were my footprints.
I hopped off the porch and went for a walk. After a few steps, the ice was so hard I just walked on top of it, not sinking in, leaving no footprints.
I didn’t realize how weird the remaining prints looked until my husband went out and was like “wtf”.

2026-01-31 19:58:44 UTC

- reply

The footprints that just stop in the middle of nowhere.

2026-01-31 19:53:05 UTC

Husband saw this on our yard and was like, “did someone get fucking raptured?”
https://blossom.primal.net/7b83c6653cd6a44b69c7d8405f5f30dc0877e2d317ae5cc80360ee1d26207f87.jpg

2026-01-31 18:27:52 UTC

"Weapons" was a movie I hadn't even heard of, but it was good.
It's a 2025 horror/mystery movie with an ensemble cast, including Josh Brolin. From the same director of the 2022 horror film Barbarian, and of similar quality.
The premise is that at 2:17am in this random suburban town, a couple dozen kids from the same class all disappeared. They all walked outside their front doors, ran away, and were not seen again. Except one kid in the class.
As parents freak out, and the police aren't getting many leads, the story then follows multiple people to see what's going on. It's tense and dark, well-directed and and well-acted.
I have rather few criticisms of the film. They made some characters a bit more unlikable/annoying than they needed to, which made it slightly hard to get attached at first, but that wasn't insurmountable. And although the story does take into account the existence of doorbell cameras and such, I felt that at today's level of surveillance, what happened is unrealistic. And the resolution felt slightly rushed.
Overall, a surprisingly strong film in a genre that isn't particularly my favorite. Was entertained and tense throughout.
https://blossom.primal.net/0946a05577e15686f290694807d1e954960c15eeeb1b9a40679e2822151cb18b.jpg

2026-01-30 00:39:23 UTC

Trump has said that he would pick the next Fed chair tomorrow. Odds rapidly jumped for Warsh.
No matter who it is, nothing stops this train.
https://blossom.primal.net/957e6fc8815eea0a9f31e862626a06a6767e6bc4c752580ff590faa314ef62e1.jpg

2026-01-30 00:29:36 UTC

So I watched The Rip. A Miami cop movie with Affleck and Damon.
I liked the first half quite a bit. Really intense opening scene, good mystery setup, high emotional stakes, etc. Always happy to see Affleck and Damon together.
The second half lost me a bit. Some aspects seemed unrealistic enough to distract me and pull me out of it. And I felt the heavy hand of the writers/director in terms of character choices not really making sense, convenient scene changes, etc.
But, all together a solid cop movie. Glad I watched it.
So far out of this recent run of movies, Sinners is comfortably my top choice even though I had some issues in the third act.
https://blossom.primal.net/b465aeebfc8be72294a2ce91285bd6b3e4642daac18a31072242e18ed7a34175.jpg

2026-01-30 00:24:04 UTC

- reply

That move in DXY is nothing compared to the massive move in gold and precious metals. Precious metals are up vs everything, and by a massive magnitude.
Bull market in gold vs oil, gold vs houses, gold vs stocks, gold vs bitcoin, gold vs dollars, gold vs euro, gold vs yen, etc.
DXY is back down to the same level it was at during the 1990s when gold was like $300/oz. That just compares the dollar vs other fiat currencies, and it's like a 13% move this year vs 100% for gold and nearly 300% for silver.
https://blossom.primal.net/71c187532710c74abdcd99924da9ea9a59821ee6e03ef440161762a5cf3d1026.png

2026-01-29 16:43:47 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/e007070e14dc2f64a5ee21073511b93e8d0c36efe8983122738f46543b6130e6.jpg

2026-01-29 16:43:24 UTC

- reply

It’s wrong when they say it for bitcoin, too.

2026-01-29 15:20:21 UTC

I see some people saying, “it’s not gold going up, it’s the dollar going down” and things like that.
That’s not really the case, and there’s a simple test to see why.
When a currency crashes, it loses value relative to everything. Other currencies, real estate, stocks, precious metals, etc. Prices of normal goods and services skyrocket.
In this bull run, precious metals gained value vs other things. Gold vs oil. Gold vs stocks. Gold vs real estate. Silver vs oil, etc.
The dollar is rangebound vs other major currencies. The supply growth of the dollar this past year was 5%. It’s gold and other precious metals that went up vs everything. Partly based on fundamentals, and now seemingly due to momentum.
Now, where there is some truth to the statement: central banks in aggregate haven’t added to their holding of treasuries in ten years. The only foreign treasury purchases have been in the private sector, and at a rate lower than total US debt growth. But central banks have been buying gold. There is indeed a gradual shift toward neutral reserve assets afoot, ever since around 2009.
But that a very long process. That source of demand didn’t single-handedly drive the huge boom in precious metals over this past year. This was like a volleyball held under water and let go, soaring back up.

2026-01-29 03:35:48 UTC

- reply

Yep it’s been disappointing lately. I expected $150k in 2025 but we only got to $126k.
That’s what diversification is for.

2026-01-29 03:23:42 UTC

- reply

And it was $6.9k before that, when I first recommended it.

2026-01-29 03:12:57 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin was $26k when Broken Money was published.

2026-01-29 01:35:55 UTC

- reply

I saw The Lobster and The Killing of a Sacred Deer, and disliked both.
I liked this more than those two.

2026-01-28 21:26:04 UTC

The number of people who spent the past decade complaining about the Fed's artificially low interest rates, only to turn around and constantly complain about their slowness of cutting rates lately (as if 3.75% is super high), is comical.

2026-01-28 16:30:36 UTC

The premise of the movie Bugonia is that two conspiracy theorists (led by Jesse Plemons) kidnap a pharmaceutical CEO (Emma Stone) because they think she's an alien.
We watched it last night, and had mixed thoughts.
-It was notably darker than I thought, which is neither good nor bad but in kind of a "dark comedy" genre it was lower on comedy and higher on darkness than I would've guessed. Scenes were more violent and tense than I had expected them to be.
-I was entertained throughout, in the sense that I enjoyed watching it and was curious how it would end, if everyone would be alright or not, comedic or tragic ending, etc.
-The acting was great all around, and particularly from Plemons. No complaints about cinematography or the score.
-I felt the writing/dialogue could be a stronger. Much of it comes down to Stone's character debating with Plemon's character, the back-and-forth that they go through, and it wasn't super riveting imo.
-I have another criticism but it's a spoiler to talk about it. In general, I feel that the narrative kind of "cheats" in a sense, where details and plot points don't necessarily line up as well as they could.
Definitely glad I watched it. Was curious about this one.
https://blossom.primal.net/f49267601b3fe923dbf9ead8d46e41ebd82fac5de1bd477552ca449e3ee4506b.jpg

2026-01-26 19:34:26 UTC

- reply

Neither could we, but we stuck with it anyway.

2026-01-26 18:12:05 UTC

- reply

I think No Country translated well to the screen. And Burn After Reading is filled with unlikable idiots but I think it’s hilarious.
This movie at least had the teenager I could root for, but overall, there wasn’t enough comedy or on-screen gravitas and fascination to offset the unlikability of most of the characters.

2026-01-26 18:07:44 UTC

- reply

The car chase aspect, specifically the use of hills, was the most interesting part to me.

2026-01-26 17:37:41 UTC

As part of our currently nightly movie streak, we watched One Battle After Another.
Dicaprio, Penn, Del Toro, etc. A (very long) dark comedy-thriller about far-left terrorists and white supremacists.
Neither me nor my husband were a fan of this one at all.
-Didn't like or sympathize with almost any character (other than the teenager).
-But I also didn't find it that funny or interesting, and no character really captured a scene.
In a movie like No Country for Old Men, I didn't particularly get emotionally attached to any character either, but they're all super interesting on-screen, especially the villain. Penn plays a villain here (Colonel Lockjaw) that is both menacing and goofy, but while the writing and acting of Hans Landa in Inglorious Bastards really nails that combo, I didn't feel that way for Lockjaw. It was more jarring.
Overall acting was fine, given the quality of the actors. But no role was particularly memorable. Nothing really stood out for the cinematography or the musical score, and I didn't particularly like the writing. And several aspects seemed unrealistic in what feels like it's trying to be a fairly realistic movie.
I suspect the main issue is that on one hand, they want to capture that kind of dark-funny nihilistic vibe that several Coen brothers movies have (e.g. Fargo). But they don't quite want to fully commit to that nihilism either, and instead really do want us to emotionally attach to several of the characters here, and straddling that line didn't work for me.
https://blossom.primal.net/d89cd09ba09e3d107e3d04c9bd89925eab13598c1e0886bf47961ac4d9e72082.jpg

2026-01-25 16:12:57 UTC

You know what there aren't a lot of? Horror musicals.
Anyway, I watched "Sinners" last night, and enjoyed it more than I expected. My husband and I are currently in a movie-a-night mode after a long stretch of zero movies. Here's a quick review.
Sinners is getting a lot of hype because it was nominated for a record-breaking16 oscars. Of course, with Hollywood quality deteriorating over time, an oscar nomination isn't really what it used to be. There's some oscar-inflation, basically. And there's often a huge disconnect between what critics and insiders like vs what the public likes, especially in this highly polarized environment.
Set in1930s Mississippi, Sinners is a stylized action story about the supernatural. It's one of those elevated type of stories, where there's 1) what's happening at the surface level for entertainment, and 2) what themes those actions are meant to represent. But it didn't get as heavy-handed as I expected. Well-executed themes can deepen the entertainment, whereas heavy-handed or misaligned themes can dampen entertainment, and for me the combo was neutral-to-positive.
The music and the directing/cinematography are truly incredible. Like, outlier masterpiece level, 10 out of 10. There's a huge blues component, and the visuals are just constantly surprisingly good.
My biggest complaint is the action in the third act. That's the only aspect that detracted from its entertainment value for me. Physical fights and gun battles don't work with a consistent set of rules or power scaling. As a result, the fights feel very unrealistic, and the outcomes feel determined by where the plot needs things to go, rather than maintaining the illusion of cause-and-effect (e.g. it distracted me enough to pull me out of the immersion, and I felt the writer's hand strongly at play). Overall fight choreography is like a 4/10 here.
Thus I consider it a flawed masterpiece. Really glad I watched it for its music and visuals and overall plot concept, but was sufficiently distracted by third act details and execution.
https://blossom.primal.net/56a60b07ae1ff14982d5ea56214adaea38c1e0aa79a9c6f62256569773a45993.jpg

2026-01-24 18:39:18 UTC

Big fan of the Bill of Rights.
All ten of ‘em.

2026-01-17 15:37:08 UTC

- reply

That’s the funny thing. It’s so small. Almost all the anger is about optics.
Also, I’d wager a guess that the 49k limit (which increases over time to like 70k) is probably about the realistic demand for Chinese EVs in Canada in the first place. It’s not like there’s an enormous million-person line of demand for Chinese EVs.

2026-01-17 14:54:26 UTC

Canada lowered tariffs on Chinese EVs to similar levels of a few years ago (up to a limited number, and still 6% tariffs rather than zero).
US politicians are angry about about it, despite the fact that the US literally had/has a free trade agreement with Canada involving cars and many other products.
In the US, we keep dunking on our neighbors to the north about how lefty they are, since indeed they’re a lot more lefty than us, when ironically this decision by Canada is historically a conservative position: freer competition and lower taxes, and yet that’s the one we’re most angry about.
It's an example of how quickly perceptions can shift, the Overton window can shift, political parties ran rotate policies, etc. Everything becomes about optics and tribes.
A few years ago if someone said, "So Canada used to put 100% punitive tariffs on Chinese EVs, and now they're going to lower those a lot so that Canadians can buy more affordable EVs if they wish, and China will do the same for some Canadian stuff," most people would be like, "well, good."

2026-01-16 14:30:02 UTC

You ever read a book in one sitting? I did that with the 1979 sci fi novella Electric Forest by Tanith Lee last night when going to bed. Ended up getting to sleep a bit later than intended because of it.
Anyway, here’s a review.
In a far future world where humanity exists on hundreds of planets, most people are genetically engineered to be beautiful, and not just the wealthy, but everyone. However, some rare accidents happen.
Magdala was born crippled and ugly in a beautiful world. Given up by her prostitute mother to a state-run orphanage, she was mercilessly bullied by other kids. Now in her 20s, she works a menial job, lives in a tiny apartment, and has no friends or partner. She has considered plastic surgery, but it’s too expensive, and for her full-body condition it wouldn’t be enough to fix the issues anyway. Thus, she lives in a perpetual state of loneliness and melancholy.
Then one day, a scientist shows up and says he can make her beautiful. And as a reader will expect, it certainly does come with a catch. What follows is a generally social-intrigue type of plot, where beautiful-Magdala has to do various things for her benefactor.
Overall, I’m glad I read it, but cannot really say I liked it. I’ve been meaning to read more of this era of sci fi.
The prose was quite good. The opening premise was interesting. I genuinely couldn’t really predict where the plot would go. A few individual scenes were great.
But I did not particularly like the characters, nor did I view them as making understandable choices. Of course, plenty of characters in fiction make bad choices, but when well-characterized, those bad choices are understandable, like we see the cause and effect, we know the character enough to be like, “yep, they’d do that.” I mostly didn’t feel that here.
I did not like the details/choreography of the one action scene (I mean, if you have exactly one, then do it really well), nor did I like the epilogue.
https://blossom.primal.net/afee4c64f58771114ea4e4485e9ea155163992db739dbe22543eefe31a8dd46d.jpg https://blossom.primal.net/a8353525231d790794a074d8dd8917b5767fa93b623cda9602a8083426d9a93a.jpg

2026-01-14 19:27:56 UTC

Back in 2018-2020, I wrote a lot about how the upcoming issue of fiscal dominance would contribute heavily to populist politics.
For example, 2020:
"Populist politics then become more commonplace, and while some strands of it can be quite rational based on countering prevailing policies that are rightly viewed as needing reform, there are also more dangerous or extreme strands that begin to emerge as well, particularly if those initial and more rational strands go unaddressed. Policymakers historically face the choice of doing something to alleviate the financial burdens of the broad population, or risking outright revolution."
https://www.lynalden.com/fiscal-and-monetary-policy/
During eras of fiscal dominance, the state tends to take more control of the economy, tends to restrict capital movement, and tends to limit personal freedom, whether it's a right or left government. And they drum up as much public support as possible with a narrative.
But witnessing it playing out first hand has still been a sight to behold. I could jot it all down on paper but then admittedly have still been surprised at times as it keeps playing out. And we see both left and right varieties occurring.
For folks who want to keep government pretty limited where possible, these past six years have been absolutely wild to watch in practice. So many people forget the basic principle that any power you give your current government, a future government that you don't agree with can use that power against you.
The poles of right and left keep drifting outward, and the horseshoe theory of politics is on full display as the two populist extremes are closer together than the moderates of each side are (but then ironically, some of those moderates also unite to oppose those extremes as well). So many people lose their minds and go full communist or full fascist. And then some normal things get labeled as extreme, so people who just believe in a handful of principles that were normal a few decades ago are like out in the wilderness now.
And the centralized algos certainly contribute to it. As someone who has been active on social media for a long time, 2025 really stuck out to me, at least as much as 2020 did. I see people reorienting their positions so rapidly around new things in a sort of mass groupthink, I see people retweeting so many things that support their view despite being obvious AI slop or clearly false or out of context with just a 2-minute factcheck. Some real populist momentum waves build, and then centralized algos give them rocket fuel. Both the main wave, and the reactionary wave on the other side, are fueled by the algos for maximum engagement.
When I interviewed @nprofile…zj6n at the Oslo Freedom Forum back in 2024, he focused on algos affecting not just what people can say, but what people think. And in the year and a half since then, I think that has very much played out.
There is an enormous premium these days for being able to recognize the algo's influence on you, and to continually factcheck and emotion-check yourself, take a breath and step back, touch grass, get sun, and assess what your foundational principles are.
https://blossom.primal.net/dd901c4be2394ca6a374689c98ff2460c04e6b1ca1e5385de8cb52308a93b7cb.png
https://blossom.primal.net/8d1518397db28f510a41b728c32f245dc4411651a258fd06f0b9c7a84fc7f3f5.jpg

2026-01-13 17:30:34 UTC

You know what would be neat? Going back and reading some of George RR Martin's pre-Game of Thrones books.
Anyway, I finished the sci fi novel Windhaven during lunch today, so here's a review.
Martin co-wrote Windhaven with Lisa Tuttle in the 1970s. It was a series of three novellas, which where combined into a completed novel in 1981.
It's a story about a woman, Maris, who is a flyer. The gravity on this world is lower, and the atmosphere thicker, and the world consists of islands separated by dangerous seas. This combo allows people to fly with specialized wings, and it's the best way to send messages, although there are limited numbers of wings (without the tech to make any more) and so flyers are in a special caste.
The initial story follows Maris as she tries to change some of the caste dynamics. Specifically, wings are passed down through bloodlines regardless of skill or desire, whereas some argue that those with greater skill and desire should get the wings instead (especially because, whenever flyer crashes at sea, the wings are lost forever, and so bad flyer skill affects the whole world over time). Maris, as one might imagine, is highly skilled but lacks the bloodline, hence the problem.
Without spoilers, the book then jumps forward in time, and looks at various ethical dilemmas. Sometimes changing one aspect of society for the better, introduces new problems people didn't expect. And then solving those problems can create other problems, and so forth. It's a really interesting set of socioeconomic dynamics to explore.
There's no combat or on-page violence in the book (very little off-page as well), and the rating for the book is middling (basically anyone expecting Martin's Grimdark Game of Thrones type of stuff will be disappointed). But I think it was a very unique and quality novel that stands out vs many others I've read. It's more like, political intrigue across this island world, and the evolution of various personal relationships.
My criticisms of the book are mainly around dialogue. Martin and Tuttle were early in their careers when this was written, and it's not as well written as later stuff. Characters, despite holding different positions on a given topic, generally all speak with the same matter-of-fact voice to each other. Higher-caliber writing tends to make character voice jump out of the page more.
In contrast, a book like The Lies of Locke Lamora is pretty far on the other end of the spectrum, with character voice that just punches you in the face from the start. Most books are somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, and I felt this was too far in the robotic/sameness end of it.
The reason I found it is because Bookborn, a reviewer on YouTube, decided to read through Martin's entire backlog and said this was her favorite one, and arguably in her top five books of all time.
While I wouldn't rank it like that personally, I definitely found it interesting, especially the second two thirds, and was curious to see the evolution of Martin's work over his career. There was also one particular sad thing in it that (the Ballad of Aron and Jeni) that made me tear up for a moment, and I was thinking about it for a while afterward.
https://blossom.primal.net/e716bd63bc285f7273c7a656bbae5df05491468573f54f54d84cae2b24f71bf6.jpg

2026-01-12 01:17:26 UTC

The DOJ served the Fed with a subpoena and threatened Powell with a criminal indictment related to the Fed's expensive renovations.
Powell, rather than releasing the minimal version of a statement that merely disagreed with the accusation, instead released a statement and video that pretty much went scorched earth, saying this isn't really about the renovations and is instead about the Fed's independent control of interest rates.
Historically speaking, this is the biggest direct clash between the Fed and the Executive Branch since the 1940s/1950s.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/powell20260111a.htm

2026-01-11 01:48:26 UTC

- reply

The printing press and moderately high literacy rates are basically the threshold for that.

2026-01-10 19:02:19 UTC

- reply

imo, one of the only things more valuable than time, is principles.

2026-01-10 17:40:45 UTC

Rather than choosing their tribe based on shared principles, most people just reprogram their principles around whatever their tribe is doing.

2026-01-10 01:13:04 UTC

- reply

Course not.

2026-01-10 00:03:24 UTC

- reply

This guy had thousands.

2026-01-09 22:56:30 UTC

Just rode with an uber driver who has a perfect 5.00 rating. Don’t think I’ve seen that before. It’s almost always 4.9 something.
It was an older gentleman wearing a three piece suit, driving a Corolla. Super friendly.
Basically the final boss of uber drivers.

2026-01-08 00:42:15 UTC

- reply

Quite solid.
Not my normal fare, but when I travel I tend to let loose.

2026-01-08 00:39:04 UTC

I had to fly down south to help a relative with a health issue.
I’m at a Cracker Barrel for the first time, since it’s adjacent to my hotel. The 50-something waitress is calling me “baby girl” when asking if I need anything.
I texted my husband like, “there are apparently two people in the world comfortable enough to call me ‘baby girl’, you and this waitress.”
Southern hospitality tends to stand out for those that are not familiar with it. A couple years ago, my husband and I went down to South Carolina for a wedding, stayed at a random hotel, and in the parking lot as we walked up to it, a random couple that was leaving the hotel said “how y’all doin?” In the warmest possible tone. Up north, that kind of thing is rare. We just pass each other in parking lots. That’s our way. So we were like, “uh, good…” ::awkward smile::

2026-01-08 00:27:56 UTC

- reply

XD
#nevent1q…p7sh

2026-01-07 21:28:48 UTC

The USDA’s new food pyramid is pretty lit.
https://blossom.primal.net/96145f641dc0486a856e7867f0f301dcde3bceb2329e6d3e05fde94dbea66957.jpg

2025-12-30 16:00:11 UTC

The ratio of AI slop posts across Twitter now is pretty wild.

2025-12-30 01:02:04 UTC

- reply

Gay people exist in real life, and having some gay characters in fiction is normal.
The issue is bad writing, forced themes, etc. Even many gay people would watch that particular Stranger Things scene and be like “uh… this is bad”.

2025-12-30 00:37:29 UTC

The mega-flop episode in this last season of Stranger Things gave me a new marketing pitch for my upcoming sci fi novel:
https://blossom.primal.net/8200e82326fa882b1299b6c57ed65d01b3427a216c9ecaa262d451a37ea4c386.png

2025-12-29 19:38:25 UTC

You know what would be crazy? Just deciding to skip punctuation.
Cormac McCarthy, the bestselling and Pulitzer-winning author of books like No Country For Old Men, The Road, and Blood Meridian, famously didn't like quotation marks, felt they cluttered the page, and so he didn't use them.
When dialogue happens in his novels, there are no quotes around it, and you as the reader just have to figure out when a line is narration or dialogue. He also didn't use semicolons or exclamation points or certain other forms of punctuation. While he didn't exclude commas entirely, he did minimize them, and instead used extra "ands" in place of where many other authors would use commas. He used periods normally.
His prose isn't my cup of tea, but there's no denying his success, and it goes to show that you can kind of just do things.
https://blossom.primal.net/a3c2dff2e8680c831ab6df0244f23411acbe037e2e2e5040a739ca64ffce5d25.png

2025-12-27 20:17:12 UTC

- reply

Yeah.

2025-12-24 17:27:43 UTC

I for one am grateful for the work of those who seek ways to make Bitcoin quantum-secure.
I remember back in my freshman year of college, which would've been nearly twenty years ago now, hearing about quantum computers and thinking we might have them in a decade.
When I first bought bitcoin, it was with the notion in mind that maybe one day quantum computers at scale would exist, that one day the Bitcoin network might have to upgrade for it, as it has updated in the past for other things. Bitcoin is resilient against many risks, but I've generally thought that to be one worth watching.
I think some of the recent concerns about quantum are overdone. Bitcoin goes through seasons, and this is clearly quantum season. But it is true that some institutions and potential large buyers are worrying about bitcoin's quantum resistance, and thus its price can be impacted even if the software is not. This can pass, in time. And those who develop potential mitigation paths, that help figure out what the most efficient and resilient upgrades would be if they are needed, are doing good work on that front.
Much like how some people are understandably spooked by just the risk of quantum (i.e. even if you believe there's a ~5% chance of it happening in some investable time horizon, that factors into your expected value analysis), others are understandably relieved by knowing that people are working on it and that mitigation paths do exist. And I'm glad they're doing that.

2025-12-23 22:35:15 UTC

- reply

I wrote multiple times a year ago that privacy would continue to be suppressed regardless of administration.
It is.

2025-12-23 22:32:53 UTC

- reply

One of my most popular posts here was when I simply reminded people that our politicians are retarded.
This was when Trump was surging in the polls last year. I talked about why both him and Biden were retarded, not just Biden. This was at a time when many people needed hope that one side might be smart, that maybe Trump wasn’t retarded as his literally senile competitor was. As if they forgot the 2027-2021 run.
Now, here in December 2025, with a repeated failure to release the full Epstein files, and he himself implicated in many of them, and MAGA turning against him, are you surprised?
Everyone knew he was a bad person. People just argued for why a bad person was needed, or why his bad values wouldn’t interfere with his policies.
But yeah, bad people rule things badly.
Nothing stops this train.
#nevent1q…kn89

2025-12-23 20:57:41 UTC

- reply

Well, having read this, for the fun of it I just retweeted it to my 800k followers too.

2025-12-22 17:26:35 UTC

Imagine if you won the lottery, but were in another state, and now had to get back to that state with the lottery ticket. If you were to somehow lose the ticket, you’d lose it all. Like carrying a single private key to a few thousand bitcoin in your pocket or something.
Anyway, here’s a review of Night Moves by Jared Dillian. It’s a collection of 16 short stories about situations like that, and although they are drastically different from each other, I’d say the overall theme is “dark comedy slice-of-life”. Most are about some variation of death, addiction, sex, temptation, or compulsion.
I’m primarily familiar with Dillian’s financial work- he’s a former Wall Street trader and a current financial newsletter writer. He’s also a DJ and fiction writer, which is the side of his work I’m less familiar with, until now.
I usually read full novels rather than collections of short stories. And the majority of the novels I read tend to be fantasy or sci fi; basically stories about the past or the future. This one consists of short stories that are mostly set near the present day.
The characters in the stories range from grungy teenagers to aging dentists, from up-and-coming weather forecasters to divorced ladies, from working professionals to homeless alcoholics, and everything in between.
More than half could be classified as tragedies in the sense that you’re basically reading a slow-motion trainwreck happening. But tragedy is not the theme of the collection per se; some of them are quite constructive and happy. Others are kind of neutral and comical. And that keeps you guessing as you read- any given story might end happily or sadly, or somewhere in between.
I found the writing to be clear and smooth, and was always happy to get to another story. I’d spend 10 minutes reading one between periods of work or exercise or something, as a mental reset. My mind would get to enter this other character’s weird life for a moment to see what problem or situation they’re dealing with.
If I have to critique what was otherwise a great read, I’d say some of the stories ended rather abruptly or anti-climactically. In those cases I’d find myself wanting a few more pages of resolution. But that seems quite intentional, and basically the best critique an author could receive is that the reader wanted a bit more of what they were reading. If I were reading a 300+ page book that ended anti-climatically I’d be annoyed, but weird slice-of-life short stories ending anti-climactically is indeed like real life, and feels like the correct writing choice in these cases.
Since this one was quite enjoyable, I’ll look to pick up one of his essay collections such as “Those Bastards” or “Rule 62” at some point.
https://blossom.primal.net/4fd6d55edf3971a70057145a5e7ba047262721873a6bf39c4321ea0dfa5685ba.jpg

2025-12-20 20:23:36 UTC

Good morning.
I’m bullish on Lightning, meanwhile quantum computing won’t matter here in the 2020s.

2025-12-18 20:53:14 UTC

Just saw someone wearing a mask while driving alone in their car.
In the year of our lord 2025.

2025-12-11 00:38:31 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/eb22b3b7aef1c21d415a73bbc8c20fe5463b09eb9f64efd470821f3ccaa46f87.jpg

2025-12-10 23:00:45 UTC

- reply

Foxes shouldn’t wear socks.

2025-12-10 22:45:13 UTC

Here's the "No BS" macro news for today.
-The Fed projected, back in early 2024, that they would likely end balance sheet reduction around this time and transition toward gradually increasing their balance sheet in line with nominal GDP (so that banks' fractional reserve lending remains unaffected with current regulations).
-It got pulled forward slightly, perhaps two or three months, by the government shutdown overfilling the Treasury cash account (i.e. sucking cash out of the broader financial system).
-The Fed previously announced they would stop reducing their balance sheet. Today they said they would start gradually increasing it. Powell said the baseline is $20-$25 billion per month, but due to current liquidity shortages and April tax day (which drains liquidity), they plan to increase it by $40 billion per month through April (which afterward in May, conveniently, is when Powell will be replaced as chairman with a presumably more dovish chairman).
-They're focusing on printing money to buy short-term duration Treasuries, not long-term. This is for the financial system, not economic stimulus per se, and so they won't be calling it QE.
-The Fed will now be structurally expanding their balance sheet while inflation is above their own target.
-This is a gradual print scenario. It's bullish for liquidity and liquidity-correlated assets, in general. It's not explosively bullish, but it does lean dovish.
-Nothing stops this train.
https://blossom.primal.net/d415c82270a843cbf1350b96d0c72dc30c3f42d38ade9641c51da29f61256d80.png
https://blossom.primal.net/d3ea177cb78ebb015fcb99c72c29c2db87e94e5bf8aebfe226fee2b86196aa7b.png

2025-12-09 01:18:25 UTC

- reply

The treasury buybacks are a liquidity management tool, because the amount of debt outstanding has outpaced trading volumes of that debt. It improves the liquidity of off-the-run securities.
They are a net issuer, not a net buy-backer. The buybacks are a sign of fiscal dominance but not something I put much macro weight on.

2025-12-09 00:56:45 UTC

There's an annual contest for indie-published fantasy books called SPFBO, and it's been running for ten years now. When looking for indie novels to read, that's not a bad list to start from.
Anyway, here's a review of "The Thief Who Pulled on Trouble's Braids", which was the first winner of that contest.
It's the first in a five-book series that focuses on a thief named Amra Thetys. Amra is kind of your typical anti-hero thief; she grew up in a rough spot and does some bad stuff but basically has a heart of gold. At about 200 pages, the book is a short read, but I guess the series as a whole is like one 1,000+ page book.
I liked the first half quite a bit. It's fast-paced and gets right into the story. The prose is solid enough. Amra quickly gets pulled by her friend into some criminal mess, with some dark omens sent her way, and we go from there.
In particular, a bloodwitch came up to her on the street once she got pulled into the mess, and said:
"I See blood, and gold," she said, her voice gone all hollow. "I Hear a mournful howl. Fire and Death are on your trail, girl, and behind them the Eightfold Bitch makes her way to your door. One of Her Blades has noticed you. But will it find your hand, or your heart? Unclear, uncertain..."
Amra was freaked out, because bloodwitches can turn your blood to rust and see the future. So I was like, "alright, you've got my attention."
But the second half was somewhat disappointing. Things were just kind of happening, there was a rapidly expanding character list, magic kind of just did whatever it needed to, and I wasn't very emotionally attached to anyone. The ending was okay, but it primarily set up the rest of the series.
I probably won't pick up the second book in the series anytime soon, though from the ratings and how this one went, I could imagine the five of them all being a fun enough read.
https://blossom.primal.net/061438125b22e5b4ad63d9e26f0c774e05e095d252b8ae3417d7f42c8099b769.jpg

2025-12-07 23:27:25 UTC

Mt Everest had its first documented climb in 1953.
The first person went to space in 1961.
It's kind of crazy to think about how "new" mankind's spread over the world is. My father was already a teenager the first time someone climbed Everest, and in his twenties by the time someone went to space.
If we start the "modern era" as roughly coinciding with the telecommunications age (ie the dawn of the cross-continental telegraph in the1860s), it's less than two consecutive human lifetimes old.
Everything is new.

2025-12-07 22:18:47 UTC

Whenever we go to the local Italian restaurant, the waitress asks if we want dessert or coffee afterward.
I know it's a common thing, but for the life of me I don't know why anyone would want coffee after a big meal at night.

2025-12-04 15:32:09 UTC

- reply

I hardly watched any, but it would be Bladerunner 2049.

2025-12-04 15:30:58 UTC

- reply

This is my model portfolio for mass audiences, many of which would otherwise have zero.
It’s not my recommended allocation for people who have studied bitcoin extensively.

2025-12-03 22:03:21 UTC

My December public macro newsletter has been published.
You can check it out here:
https://www.lynalden.com/december-2025-newsletter/
https://blossom.primal.net/ff59f664b4b8365696eec9ba22c72040f795066036ea23fda3c5f20477bba5e5.png

2025-12-03 17:38:08 UTC

- reply

Haven't read her first novel yet. Unlike Piranesis which is short, her first novel is very long and I've not had the energy to read it compared to other things on my list.

2025-12-03 17:09:58 UTC

What if the world as you knew it consisted of infinite rooms and staircases, each partially flooded and filled with strange statues, and it only had two living people in it? That would be nuts right?
Anyway, I read Piranesi, by Susanna Clarke, and that’s the world in which the titular character finds himself.
Notably, Clarke has only written two novels in her career, they were 16 years apart (“Jonathan Srange and Mr Norrell” in 2004 and “Piranesi” in 2020), and both were award-winning massive bestsellers, beloved by critics and readers alike.
Piranesi lives in a realm of infinite rooms and staircases, inhabited by birds and fish and shined on by the sun and moon and stars, and in which seawaters routinely rise and fall. He has a rather meager existence as he lives off fish and seaweed and catalogues the various rooms, and he is grateful that the world is generous enough to provide for him. For the most part he’s the only person around, except occasionally he runs into one more guy he calls “The Other.” He also knows of 15 human skeletons that he has names for.
Clarke did plenty of historical research and makes a lot of allusions in the work. It’s rather literary, and the whole thing is quite a surrealist artsy story and it’s much loved by people who enjoy sophisticated things.
I am, perhaps, not very sophisticated.
To me this felt like the kind of book I’d be assigned to read in high school. It was rather dry and boring to my unsophisticated palate, though short enough to breeze through in several sittings. I predicted most of the mystery in advance, and as things happened I’d be like, “alright.” When something occasionally did surprise me, it was always mildly to the downside. Like someone tells you lunch will be a mystery, and then come lunchtime it’s revealed to be a sandwich.
I know a lot of people who rave about this book, so it’s been on my to-read list for a while, and now I have that good feeling of finished homework. When people talk about Piranesi I can be like, “Ah, yes, Piranesi. Fine literature, that is.”
https://blossom.primal.net/7ed7552111f45b4687be2b06f215990021307da7b6781231629e91f4aab8ddc7.jpg

2025-12-03 03:45:20 UTC

- reply

You know what show ended right when it should have?
Breaking Bad, of course.
#nevent1q…3xzh

2025-12-03 03:44:26 UTC

- reply

Yeah that concise format impressed me as a teen. I’ve liked it ever since.

2025-12-02 22:48:13 UTC

Too many shows and book series go on for too long. Rather than end at an ideal spot to maximize the art/story of it all, they keep going until the creators get bored or the money isn't flowing anymore.

2025-12-02 22:40:42 UTC

Finally getting a moment to start watching The Boys season 4.
Watched up to season 3 a while back, which is where it was up to at the time. Anyone else watch it?
https://blossom.primal.net/c1c0fe150948499d6d78b607c2cf2ffb92957c1f3e2af7687c2180872c9a1899.jpg

2025-11-29 02:29:42 UTC

- reply

To be fair there are some hipsters in that part of the Venn diagram.

2025-11-27 21:50:14 UTC

Moorish Spain was the period from the 8th to 15th centuries when Muslims ruled the Iberian peninsula.
Anyway, here's a book review of The Lions of Al-Rassan by Guy Gavriel Kay, which I've had time to finish on this fine Thanksgiving day. It's historical fiction written back in 1995 about the final years of Moorish Spain.
Guy Gavriel Kay is known for writing stories that are mostly historical fiction, but with a small touch of fantasy. In this story, Al-Rassan refers to the southern part of Spain/Portugal controlled by Muslim city-states, while three Christian kings rule their mini-kingdoms in northern Spain/Portugal. In this book, Muslims are called Asharites and identify with the stars, Christians are called Jaddites and identify with the sun, and Jews are called Kindath and identify with the twin moons over this world (which is a touch of the aforementioned fantasy element).
Ultimately, it's a story about love and friendship across cultural boundaries, but duty that sometimes has to separate them.
The three main characters are Ammar (an Asharite poet-swordsman), Rodrigo (a Jaddite noble knight-leader), and Jehane (a Kindath physician), and it spans a few years as the Jaddites and Asharites grow increasingly hostile toward each other. The story is probably best summed up when Ammar laments that the concerning way things are headed, it's likely not going to be his poetry that he's remembered for.
It's not as simple as two sides of a war, though. The Asharite city-states of Al-Rassan are rather secular, as are the Jaddite mini-kingdoms in the north. But the Jaddite clergy seeks to push those secular Jaddite kings to have a holy war and retake the peninsula, and the Asharite warlords back across the strait seek to push those secular Asharite kings to reclaim their peak of power of the peninsula as well. So there are basically four powerful factions in conflict, along with the Kindath as the fifth minor element.
The word "Lions" in the The Lions of Al-Rassan refers to men without equal. Ammar and Rodrigo both represent basically the pinnacle of their sides, and it's a story about what happens as those two "Lions" meet in the waning days of Al-Rassan.
I mostly enjoyed the plot, as well as the main three characters. Guy Gavriel Kay is kind of an "author's author", meaning that several authors consider him one of the top authors out there, but his books only have moderate popularity compared to the top bestsellers. Kay also helped Tolkien's son edit The Silmarillion back in the 1970s after Tolkien's death.
Although Kay is praised for his prose, it's not my favorite. I prefer more concise, straightforward prose, whereas this is somewhat poetic in nature. To me there's a slight distracting element when prose is written like that. The author Brandon Sanderson has used the analogy of clear glass vs stained glass when it comes to prose style. Sanderson's prose is "clear glass" meaning you read for the story, not the prose. Kay's prose is "stained glass" meaning that you read partially for the prose itself, with the trade-off that it's harder to see the story/characters as perfectly clearly through it. And then of course there are many subtypes. Kay's prose just doesn't vibe with me well.
I think it's a great book, with strong themes and intricate politics and a broad cast of fascinating characters. Some will quite enjoy the prose, but it made me slightly detached from the characters as I read it.
https://blossom.primal.net/7db4d6b42d4435a97487d5429a68b21bad0ef66e3875fb7b0ba73e1ec5c7881f.jpg

2025-11-23 17:44:20 UTC

I find Bladerunner 2049 frustrating, because I *almost* love it.
The characters, themes, acting, and the overall plot structure are great, imo.
However, villains give melodramatic exposition monologues, villains leave heroes alive for no reason other than the plot needs them to, important things are left thinly guarded for no reason other than the plot needs the heroes or villains to easily get at them, etc. In other words, there are distracting writing/execution issues in what could otherwise be a masterpiece.
The first time I watched it, I didn't love it. It did stick with me though; I think about it sometimes, for years afterward. And watching it a second time I appreciated it more, but still was frustrated by the same things.
What does everyone else feel about it?
https://blossom.primal.net/9ebe083032f03d51762fbdc6458a40969fc68e8f7d582ffe036ca1afcaabfb91.jpg

2025-11-22 17:12:18 UTC

It was around autumn 2012 that Japan ramped up its central bank balance sheet dramatically.
Notably, that's also when their GDP peaked in dollar terms, and their stock market had its generational bottom.
Japan serves as an example that what's going on economically can be very different than the stock market.
https://blossom.primal.net/0aa986314f775b83038a4d24ea5232fe734e5c8c0e400f5f019b91411075be89.png
https://blossom.primal.net/f07d166b793f408093a086bb02e0360b92fc298f678d635813431774f0420d72.png

2025-11-22 15:47:40 UTC

What's going on in Sudan gets an order of magnitude less coverage than what's going on in other military hot spots of the world, despite being of similar magnitude.
Perhaps I tend to think of it a lot because Sudan borders Egypt to the south. So it's geographically in my mind more tangibly.
People can only get emotionally engaged about a handful of things. The world is too big and noisy for us to care about everything. That way lies madness. But it's still interesting which things do reach us, and rile us up.
When violence gets covered heavily in the media, it's often said that it's about the numbers, the humanity of it. But in reality, conflicts at the intersection between major religions, major military powers, or where there is a lot of oil, are what get most of the coverage. If violence happens to people outside of that scope, it's often drowned out and ignored.
Social media and algorithms are powerful. In a situation where it might be reasonable to care about something 2x or 3x as much as another thing due to geopolitical implications and such, social media can put it in front of you 200x or 300x as frequently, and thus make you care or think about it 200x or 300x more.
The issue is fractal, and so it happens the same at smaller scales. In any given industry or community, there are certain topics that get an order of magnitude more coverage and discussion than a dozen other things of similar scale or importance. And then people get sucked into an echo chamber where they think the 3-5x things that are frequently in front of them, and that their mind is mostly focused on, are indeed the 3-5x most important things when in reality it's mostly the algorithm reinforcing itself, and reinforcing that aspect of human nature that moves in groups.
Being able to sculpt your own algorithm is important, but equally it helps to be aware of the algorithm's influence in the first place. When you hear about something a ton, ask why. When you don't hear about something big very often, also ask why.
___
"Sudan plunged into a civil war in April 2023 after a vicious struggle for power broke out between its army and a powerful paramilitary group, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
It has led to a famine and claims of a genocide in the western Darfur region - with fears for the residents of city of el-Fasher after it was recently captured by the RSF.
More than 150,000 people have died in the conflict across the country, and about 12 million have fled their homes in what the United Nations has called the world's largest humanitarian crisis."
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjel2nn22z9o

2025-11-21 05:37:49 UTC

- reply

lol
#nevent1q…ezy9

2025-11-19 19:03:51 UTC

- reply

I'm using Thorn (who does talk to institutions, and most institutions are shitcoiners) as one example. But then I also pointed out that I talk to those institutional allocators to, and I'm hearing it directly from them- they're worried about quantum and macro, not Core/Knots. Many don't even know about Core/Knots.
Feel free to fork consensus. My argument has been that filters won't stop non-monetary transactions from getting into the blockchain if they meet consensus, and indeed they have not, which is why people are still talking about it and are now talking about potential forks.

2025-11-19 18:58:00 UTC

- reply

This is base liquidity, not broad liquidity. Broad liquidity is still pretty good, but AI stocks and gold have been the biggest beneficiaries this year rather than bitcoin.
A lot of people bought bitcoin last year due to expectations about a sovereign bitcoin reserve and things like that, and those sorts of expectations are being washed out.

2025-11-19 16:23:20 UTC

- reply

Same thing happens in macro. Doomers will be like “all this debt is going to implode and be deflationary” and then the central bank and fiscal authorities respond and print money. Deflation gone, enter inflation.
And then other doomers always expect hyperinflation around the corner, even though policymakers do respond to currency weakness as well. It’s not to say it can never happen, but it’s never on the timeline they think.
Risks need to be monitored, but most systems do have responsive control loops in them that mitigate risks more than doomers think.

2025-11-19 16:16:24 UTC

- reply

Nah, most large potential buyers are unaware of the Core/Knots saga. And OG levels of selling are consistent with prior bull runs.
From institutional buyers I've spoken to (some of their largest), their biggest concern this year is quantum. Quantum risks went from being off their radar to being one of the key things they ask about. If you bring up Core/Knots/spam many will ask what you mean.
https://blossom.primal.net/a173c8f6a548fb8b5478f063f5db92360f99de829a996b36e772673b34bce1e6.png

2025-11-19 16:02:34 UTC

As long as borrowing stress remains elevated, many asset prices are likely to remain choppy.
This is why the Fed is ending balance sheet reduction, but simply ending it is not necessarily sufficient. By 2026 they will likely go back to balance sheet expansion to put out this fire. Notably, it likely won't be very fast/large balance sheet expansion, but rather will be just enough to help settle this down, which makes a big difference.
https://blossom.primal.net/9ed881da37545f459d6a79d9aeaff6e1dfcfeb98ad450260b723c4126b964fbb.png

2025-11-17 21:52:10 UTC

- reply

Will eventually have news about that!

2025-11-16 17:36:28 UTC

- reply

It’s out now. On the author website.

2025-11-16 16:18:54 UTC

What if humanity could find some alien tech and thus greatly accelerate its own technological progress? But what if that tech was hoarded by a small group of people?
Anyway, here's a review of Theft of Fire by Devon Eriksen. It's a 22nd century hard science space opera set in our solar system, written by a retired engineer. One of the more successful indie sci fi books in recent years. It's also one of the most successful books to have bitcoin in it; it's a small background role, but bitcoin is one of the leading types of money in the solar system.
Marcus, an indebted down-on-his-luck asteroid miner (and secretly, a bit of a space pirate as of late, given how bad things have gotten) finds his ship taken over by a wealthy genetically modified corporate heiress named Miranda. She has bought his defaulting debt contract that his ship collateralizes, and has gained admin access over his ship's computer. And she knows he is secretly a space pirate, which altogether gives her multiple types of leverage over him. She wants him to take her on a mission to the edge of the solar system to do something she won't say, involving unimaginable treasure, and he has little choice but to go along with it. Secretly, however, he plots how to regain control of his ship as they go, because he recognizes how much of a suicide mission it is because of who guards the space out there.
Pros:
-The hard scientific realism in the book is great. The type that basically takes an engineer to write. No wonder he has endorsements from like, the co-founder of Autocad and such. It's also a smooth read, all from Marcus's perspective.
-Although the story mostly takes place on one ship with a few characters, the worldbuilding is a solid start. I assume it'll be expanded later in the series. The technological situation and structure of society are very fleshed out relative to how little we actually see, given the tight setting. The world feels realistic and lived-in.
-High nostalgia factor. Fans of Firefly and Cowboy Bebop, and more recently the Expanse, and all sorts of classic sci fi literature over decades, will find a lot of references or similarities in a good way. The author is very well-read on the genre.
-The audiobook is pretty unique and great. Unlike most audiobooks, it has a full-cast production, meaning that each line of dialogue sounds like the person speaking it, rather than just one person reading a given chapter's narration and dialogue. I listened to this one rather than read it. You can only buy the audiobook on the author's website though, not Amazon/Audible. (Amazon/Audible have been kind of shitty to authors lately.) The other version of the book are available on Amazon.
-AI gets a really good treatment here, and the third main character, an AI, is my favorite character in the book.
-There's a lot of suspense throughout. Most of it is not really predictable how it's going to end since it doesn't follow a basic tropey structure. Even if you don't particularly like some of the characters (and indeed they're designed to be rather unlikable), you're likely to find yourself reading further to see what happens.
Cons:
-The book is about 500 pages, and I think 50+ could have been cut out of the middle to make it stronger. The dialogue between Marcus and Miranda gets rather repetitive after a while. And because of the limited setting (mostly on one ship), most of the worldbuilding is done via exposition by Marcus. So if readers hate "info dumps", they'll probably get annoyed at this. I personally don't really mind exposition as long as it's good, so this wasn't a dealbreaker for me (the "don't do exposition!" advice to authors is overdone in my view). I just think the middle could have used a trim. And although most of the book is not predictable, one aspect imo very much is, and that's where a lot of the repetition is.
-There are some unnerving aspects/scenes in it. I can't really say what they are without spoilers. Let's just say being in Marcus's head for 500 pages isn't, uh, my cup of tea. The book is self-aware about it, though. It's an intentional choice to have put these unnerving aspects in, so it's not a con per se but it's more something that will put off some readers. And it's a little more understandable by the end.
Overall, a unique story. And for the audiobook, I do think that over time more audiobooks will be made with this more complete type of cast. Audiobooks used to be very expensive and a small piece of the market, and only in recent years have they become very popular. As they become a bigger and bigger share of the fiction market up to some substantial percentage, I think more work will go into their quality and details.
https://blossom.primal.net/97ffcbd483eb7a8d4dcabe38c61846dc09bff96901e9abd7334c2d93f497c8c2.jpg

2025-11-14 15:13:05 UTC

The bond market has been getting a bit nervous about companies with a lot of AI capex ahead. Chart via BofA.
https://blossom.primal.net/34a1d78eac4035d3e5b87ff9a5958322bce4e043a7fb9ed73c9fa8563b206904.png

2025-11-10 21:38:36 UTC

- reply

Infrastructure to facilitate merchant acceptance is way more interesting than nation state bitcoin reserves, imo.
#nevent1q…yvv9

2025-11-09 15:57:57 UTC

People have discussed how there's been a lot of bitcoin selling among 5+ year hodlers.
What often gets left out of the discussion is that over time, more and more hodlers naturally age into being 5+ year hodlers. So, some long-term hodlers are selling, but that's part of more and more people becoming long-term hodlers.
At 30%, the percentage of bitcoin that has been unmoved onchain for 5+ years is near its peak level.
https://blossom.primal.net/4ede1cd03c75e5c3403298c57166debd184ef950a5fb2c23d6f854f7b23bc4ff.png

2025-11-04 18:30:32 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/f2891de1e62d9df4fe876e6b72e2b0b6a4cdf61a01f4629db1947a9e4d8f54d3.gif

2025-11-03 22:33:14 UTC

I realized the other day that Wikipedia has an article for me now.
It doesn't mention most of my work or Broken Money, but it does mention that nothing stops this train. 🤷
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyn_Alden
https://blossom.primal.net/6f6476b72a10b242e0d8098de29992693d6a47d06f38a6bdf379a58c3292d791.png

2025-10-28 03:36:53 UTC

- reply

Well I just read about the destruction of the Mericanii, so there’s that.

2025-10-28 03:33:11 UTC

- reply

You’d probably like this one, though it takes some time to get into.
I’ve read Hyperion but haven’t yet gone deeper into the series. Been meaning to read The Fall of Hyperion at least.