Hanshan

https://i.delta.chat/#78310EF328F159EFE775A28825A2125A63B29A82&i=_PHJkyCSLiClxlfClbZ_YEsf&s=NYfR6ySNFgZKvC0WdVHPk_Ob&a=hanshan%40hanshan.io&n=Hanshan

People improve through making mistakes.
Free people make their mistakes faster.

Nostrich since 761114.

Public Key

npub1lxzaxzge0jq9u9cecucctdt5lslwgp7hcxmp2l0wn8r2ecjenwasu6svxa

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs0npwnpyvheqz7zuvuwvv9k460c0hyqlturds40hhfn34vufvehwcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs7amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5q3yamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vgq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skueqflyraa

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1lxzaxzge0jq9u9cecucctdt5lslwgp7hcxmp2l0wn8r2ecjenwasu6svxa

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-04 14:08:48 UTC

- reply

which is the logical thing to do when it becomes clear that we made the wrong design choices back then.

2026-03-04 14:07:15 UTC

- reply

you see
God, or whatever you want to call the force that governs this intricate mechanism, provided to me mechanism for wondering about the world and how it is put together. I use that to get observational data and wonder about creation.
when I don't understand something, I find that further investigation usually result in uncovering unbelievable beauty.
I feel sorry for you, your dull plodding faith and lack of wonder at the mystery of creation.

2026-03-04 04:03:45 UTC

- reply

weeeellll maybe Ultima V
because EGA
I spoke too fast

2026-03-04 04:02:36 UTC

- reply

Ultima IV

2026-03-04 04:00:15 UTC

- reply

its incredibly interesting to me how my way of thinking changes depending on what information I consume.
maybe I should have written "information"

2026-03-04 02:25:46 UTC

- reply

wisp is a light seen in the forest at night

2026-03-04 02:23:35 UTC

- reply

I dunno man
他人に優しく
自分に厳しい

2026-03-04 01:38:51 UTC

- reply

no we do, but the spread is lousy.
and not back the other way.
I think we need less fucking around providing ecash mints and LN service providers,
and more development on cross-chain atomic swaps.
there's plenty of blockspace, it isn't a scarce resource.

2026-03-04 01:36:58 UTC

- reply

users made their choice
but it didn't have anything to do with the nodes being to hard to run because blocksize.

2026-03-04 01:30:01 UTC

- reply

also
we don't have to go to L2
#nevent1q…nf02

2026-03-04 00:41:36 UTC

- reply

LN is a lot of things
but "elegant" isnt a word I'd use personally.
the advantage of just scaling horizontally is we don't need to study the ALL the new security tradeoffs.
its just a copy with some tweaks and there are some bridges in/out..
it'd be cool if i could pop open your note when im typing a reply and forget what you said

2026-03-04 00:16:10 UTC

- reply

having an overflow blockchain makes sense when there are high fees tho
then we can have a 3rd when that one gets full.
everybody can decide if they want to pay for Bitcoin1 security or have cheap Bitcoin3 payments

2026-03-04 00:09:15 UTC

- reply

found the gay modern 😉
/s
idk why we're tagged in this bullshit

2026-03-03 20:34:24 UTC

- reply

I'd love to see that graphic minus all the centralized LN solutions

2026-03-03 20:26:20 UTC

- reply

that seems like a good take to me bro

2026-03-03 17:53:34 UTC

- reply

oh cool
do do you have to have both SSDs installed in the same machine to use clonezilla?

2026-03-03 17:50:00 UTC

- reply

I'm sure my guy just didn't want to have another " you know e Cash is custodial right?" conversation

2026-03-03 16:42:40 UTC

- reply

My first thought is that " nobodty cares"
ie obv there isn't demand for this, the mempool is empty. maybe we do this after blocks are full?
oh but we HAVE to go ahead and do this because no normie will use L1 for P2P transactions because we ruined the UX with our design choices.
and my second thought is that this is just recreating banks. it's just a centralized custodian on Bitcoin. they are either doxed and vulnerable to regulatory pressurw or they're shady.
so we're recreating banks in order to make up for ruining L1 usage. awesome.
when do we get to the Freedom Money part? That's what I signed up for.

2026-03-03 15:36:08 UTC

- reply

you hear about the ones that make it to the mainstream.
99% of them get crushed and absorbed.

2026-03-03 15:35:02 UTC

- reply

which is fine.
but the OP is about whether a nonfungible MoE can be mainstream adopted.
as I said, the prognosis isn't good.

2026-03-01 04:19:59 UTC

- reply

you're right of course

2026-02-28 04:59:13 UTC

#Bitcoin is a template and any decentralized PoW chain is the same damn thing.
#nevent1q…u2u9

2026-02-28 02:40:43 UTC

- reply

i dont know that I've ever successfully used the GUI installer from any Ubuntu-based distro

2026-02-27 19:09:55 UTC

- reply

People can do whatever they want.
If you dont like the current governance and you're confident hash will follow value, fork around and find out.

2026-02-27 17:34:16 UTC

- reply

I depend on an underlying value prop that custodial Bitcoin erodes my dude.
If it's only me and other zealots actually using Bitcoin, it isn't valuable.

2026-02-27 17:27:55 UTC

- reply

Kinda.
The only reason ANYBODY gives a fuck is because they don't want NGD.
#Bitcoin forks aren't a problem.
#nevent1q…qvj3

2026-02-27 17:12:29 UTC

- reply

I understand the desire to fire Core but, for real... STFU
#nevent1q…8hfs

2026-02-27 17:10:06 UTC

- reply

but pseudonymity for your UTXOs is good enough?
#monero

2026-02-27 16:04:20 UTC

- reply

I don't believe anything I read online so...

2026-02-27 15:51:21 UTC

arguing over #Bitcoin forks is ridiculous and these folks up in arms about bip 110 are telling on themselves.
by design, hash will always go where the value resides.
It doesn't matter if it's a chain with a different history.
The only reason to argue about it is because you want to preserve the *fiat value* of your UTXOs.
these people are afraid *perceived value* will change and they won't be able to pay the miners to protect their pet chain.
which is the only thing that gives it utility.
#nevent1q…6pes

2026-02-27 06:17:26 UTC

- reply

fighting over design specifics is fun,
but lets not lose sight of the big picture.
you see this one?
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Bitcoin-Labels

2026-02-27 06:16:27 UTC

- reply

as you can probably tell, my head is still exploding

2026-02-27 06:12:32 UTC

- reply

the man communicates well 👍

2026-02-27 06:10:26 UTC

- reply

in the future we will just tell our Agents to follow particular rules when paying certain kinds of invoices anyway...
"pay purchases of <1M sats from minibits. if balance is too low swap some Monero through Eigen and deposit it in the mint"
"my landlord wants L-BTC, do an atomic swap from my LN node. If there isn't enough, prompt me to sign a 10M sat withdrawal from cold storage #3."
users will decide what kind of storage they need and with which security model to secure their assets.
the software will handle moving the assets between the different chains.
as long as they are chains of digital signatures packaged in decentralized timestamped PoW blocks, they are #Bitcoin.

2026-02-27 05:36:53 UTC

- reply

I was always more of an OG Kush kinda guy

2026-02-27 03:16:00 UTC

- reply

it doesn't happen that way.
the revolution is a constant process, not an event that happens at a specific point in time.

2026-02-27 03:12:43 UTC

- reply

John turned me on to Layerzwallet this morning. They have a good list of different Bitcoin layers/sidechains they want to support.
There are a few varieties of BTC -> XMR atomic swaps. Improvements in monero scripting to make it easier are forthcoming.
More and more LN wallets are parking sats in Liquid to improve UX.
Its not terribly difficult to build atomic swaps to LTC or ZEC if there's demand for it. theyre basically BTC anyway.
and yeah, you can store your wealth in the chain with the highest hash if you want.
its all #Bitcoin man, I'm not joking.

2026-02-26 23:39:23 UTC

Bitcoin is a template for interacting with each other. It doesn't have anything to do with any specific chain or protocol.
As such, blockspace is practically infinite. It is only bounded by the amount of energy we need to do the amount of PoW that we want.
#bitcoin #monero

2026-02-26 16:16:50 UTC

- reply

depends if you have fiat-denominated expenses doesn't it?
i get your point about income but that sovereignty doesn't exist until your ouputs are also in sovereign money.
not sure theres a lot of advantage to being "Bitcoin-only" on the face of things,
and then converting to pay expenses.

2026-02-26 15:55:10 UTC

fuck this dystopia
#nevent1q…erh2

2026-02-26 15:53:34 UTC

- reply

I c/p the links into Newpipe on mobile

2026-02-26 15:40:39 UTC

- reply

you mean the hash rate is too low?

2026-02-26 04:15:41 UTC

- reply

unstoppable is now eigenwallet
https://eigenwallet.org/
it's functional but the spread is lousy.

2026-02-26 04:07:36 UTC

- reply

its the *profit derived from the creation of money*
particularly as in a monopoly,
that causes price inflation.
NOT the creation of new monetary units.

2026-02-26 04:03:22 UTC

- reply

way too few

2026-02-26 04:01:59 UTC

It's all Bitcoin.
Deal with it.
#nevent1q…ks0z
#Bitcoin

2026-02-25 02:15:22 UTC

- reply

yes

2026-02-19 16:38:28 UTC

- reply

fun fact
Bitcoin is a chain of signatures (ledger) and the sats never go anywhere 😂

2026-02-19 16:10:48 UTC

- reply

bro thinks the earth is flat AND the sats are in the paper.
what did I expect?

2026-02-17 16:22:18 UTC

- reply

lol
yeah. same reaction
within a single week I suddenly don't understand half of what I see on nostr

2026-02-17 02:19:48 UTC

sorry for the spam
client went haywire

2026-02-17 00:39:01 UTC

tribalism is against human flourishing
https://i.nostr.build/PxTIocjtBQssDeG4.jpg
#bitcoin #monero

2026-02-16 18:20:40 UTC

leaning into the digital gold/SoV usecase will kill freedom money.
#nevent1q…9lhn
#nevent1q…ysdf
#bitcoin

2026-02-15 13:14:52 UTC

- reply

"only criminals use Bitcoin"

2026-02-15 13:14:37 UTC

- reply

Where do you get this data about monetary vs non-monetary on Bitcoin?

2026-02-15 04:54:45 UTC

"I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time,
when the United States is a service and information economy;
when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries;
when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues;
when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas and or knowledgeably question those in authority;
when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting, our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness.
The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites, now down to 10 seconds or less,
lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition,
but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance."
Carl Sagan (in 1995)
https://v.nostr.build/PCTxanxguF224qer.mp4

2026-02-14 17:21:10 UTC

- reply

well, and bandwidth right?

2026-02-14 17:13:04 UTC

- reply

the sun goes down and comes up, it doesn't disappear off into the distance and then get closer from someplace far away
ships also disappear over the horizon, bottom first and mast last. Plenty of people have measured the curvature on land and sea.
the same constellations in the S hemisphere are inverted.
These are basic observations that are not explained by a flat-earth model, but are obvious on a globe.
The force that holds everything onto the globe has been a problem of natural philosophers for thousands of years.
Some of the first actual measurements are only happening in the last decade.
https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/record-breaking-gravitational-wave-puts-einsteins-relativity-to-its-toughest-test-yet-and-proves-him-right-again

2026-02-14 16:54:05 UTC

- reply

this makes sense. although I'm certainly not getting grouping like you describe even at 200 on irons.

2026-02-14 16:49:38 UTC

- reply

must be 6.5 creedmore or similar?

2026-02-14 16:34:13 UTC

- reply

anecdotal evidence aside,
I don't think it's debatable that Bitcoin adoption for payments has stalled and is actively discouraged.
before there was hash attacks on Monero, zero-conf transactions were normal and worked fine.

2026-02-14 16:26:25 UTC

- reply

this is not a metric I particularly care about.

2026-02-14 16:26:02 UTC

- reply

Price IS a signal
its a signal of how much speculative Wall Street and VC money feels Bitcoin is a better safe haven than the other options.

2026-02-14 16:24:41 UTC

- reply

its almost like alienating all the people who wanted to make Bitcoin a p2p payment system in 2018 was a mistake....

2026-02-12 19:28:15 UTC

- reply

sure, I agree it's better.
and we can still do better yet.

2026-02-12 19:11:13 UTC

- reply

It all depends how desperate they get doesn't it?
if we're talking a full-on adversarial " we are disintermediating the trillion dollar rent seekers who run the world" then I don't think it's absurd to suggest they would just throw you in a cage until you cough up your Bitcoin.
the current crop of new coiners seems to believe they're just going to quietly fade into irrelevance.
that is incredibly naive.

2026-02-12 19:02:24 UTC

- reply

this is cope.
pseudonymity is obviously not adequate.

2026-02-12 16:02:57 UTC

- reply

The problem is tor latency

2026-02-10 18:00:32 UTC

- reply

+1
wen Monero payment option?

2026-02-10 16:20:52 UTC

- reply

its possible than @nprofile…g6gq is just a bad person 😉

2026-02-10 16:07:21 UTC

- reply

I was ruthlessly shamed yesterday for using C as an American

2026-02-09 23:58:32 UTC

- reply

lol
nice try

2026-02-09 23:31:26 UTC

might fuck around and read Roger's book

2026-02-09 16:36:09 UTC

- reply

and that metric is probably measured in % of total global energy output used to "secure" the money
as opposed to measuring in fiat currency.

2026-02-09 16:31:08 UTC

- reply

its true that "network security" is a pretty ambiguous term
but what would you prefer?
The network requires securing.
and that requires an investment of resource.

2026-02-09 00:45:49 UTC

- reply

it makes something like spending multiple inputs MUCH cheaper.
so instead of a big coinjoin requiring a signature from every input, they are all aggregated into a single signature.
and since signatures are aggregated, it's suddenly A LOT more difficult for chainanal to determine which inputs belong together when users consolidate or spend.
so it would make the clustering of UTXOs that CA uses to figure ownership probabilities much more difficult.

2026-02-09 00:10:47 UTC

- reply

the next logical thing after Taproot would be to implement cross-input signature aggregation. it would make coinjoins super cheap and chain analysis more difficult across the board.
but nobody seems to give a fuck. predictably, I suppose.

2026-02-08 16:14:04 UTC

- reply

I'm talking about the game theory of the thing.
I'm well aware of that there are individuals that spend, obviously I spend it too.
The point still stands.

2026-02-08 15:41:59 UTC

- reply

Fair enough ❤️

2026-02-08 15:08:54 UTC

- reply

you mean that you prefer that only transactoors bear the burden of paying for network security?
so you can hold up hodl without being bothered about how to pay for it yourself?
instead of equitably paying for it through supply inflation i mean

2026-02-08 03:06:57 UTC

- reply

therefore
the stars in the southern hemisphere

2026-02-08 03:05:05 UTC

- reply

so which is it?
are they applying MORE critical thinking than normies or is it as a belief system?
🤔

2026-02-08 02:58:58 UTC

- reply

and it's fine if people want to do that.
but they should be clear that's what they are doing.

2026-02-08 02:46:23 UTC

- reply

but the guy in the video says it's all ships in Antarctica.
clearly that means there's a worldwide conspiracy.

2026-02-08 02:44:55 UTC

- reply

I started with this today.
#nevent1q…6qtn

2026-02-08 02:30:47 UTC

- reply

I really can't think of one TBH

2026-02-08 02:30:31 UTC

- reply

so the theory is
a model with a flat earth and ice wall would make people curious and inspired
but a copernican model with a vast, practically infinite universe doesn't?

2026-02-08 02:26:48 UTC

- reply

like most things, it's usually an exercise in developing a coherent argument yourself
and perhaps edifying for somebody who reads it

2026-02-08 02:25:25 UTC

- reply

I generally think that human history is much longer and more complicated than we think.
as you say, I expect there have been people that have known that the earth is round for several thousand years
but the point that I'm making is that people were still having this discussion, just like this, in the 17th century

2026-02-08 01:58:13 UTC

- reply

exactly.
it seems ridiculous to someone from the 17th century to imagine people walking around a ball without tumbling off into the firmament
but if it explains the data, we better try to find a force thats holding them on the ball.

2026-02-08 01:52:53 UTC

- reply

it doesn't
but its also true social cohesion is important.
I just don't think its worth suspension of personal responsibility and critical thinking, which is what I'm observing.

2026-02-08 01:37:37 UTC

if only the flat earthers WERE actually providing a viewpoint that was the product of critical thinking... 😢
#nevent1q…p9wv

2026-02-07 23:16:49 UTC

- reply

"The moon is an electromagnetic phenomena of black sun coming through the ether and passing through krypton"
very convincing 👍

2026-02-07 23:13:34 UTC

- reply

lol
these videos are supposed to prove something?
come on man

2026-02-07 21:00:16 UTC

- reply

they're not in any hurry to explain anything apparently...
why explain when you can just call someone a normie retard and post a meme?

2026-02-07 20:59:28 UTC

- reply

this is great to explain why EC is more efficient than RSA

2026-02-07 20:42:54 UTC

- reply

cute ❤️

2026-02-07 20:28:54 UTC

- reply

nobody who reads this threat is going to think that you explained anything
but I understand you have to act tough and confident now 👍

2026-02-07 20:17:35 UTC

- reply

thanks for helping me create a few threads which map mankind's attempt to understand the world from the stone ago on.
too bad you weren't able to actually explain anything beyond "we're moving upward because my phone tells me so"

2026-02-07 20:07:33 UTC

- reply

bro even eight-time vaccinated fucking retards know the difference between velocity and acceleration.
you have no excuse, get your fucking shit together.
I hope you have somebody around to wipe the spittle off your chin.