ghost

Public Key

npub1andyx2xqhwffeg595snk9a8ll43j6dvw5jzpljm5yjm3qync7peqzl8jd4

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswekjr9rqthy5u52z6gfmz7nll6cedxk82fpqled6zfdcszfu0quspzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqzxrhwden5te0wpex2mtfw4kjuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgjwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxqgewaehxw309ac8junpd45kgtnxd9shg6npvchxxmmdqy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwwdjkxtnpwpcqpp3234

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1andyx2xqhwffeg595snk9a8ll43j6dvw5jzpljm5yjm3qync7peqzl8jd4

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-02-05 09:16:12 UTC

- reply

Thank you!
2:54:30
https://rumble.com/v74p7e0-plan-forum-el-salvador-2026-day-2-live-from-the-wagmi-stage.html?start=10465

2026-02-04 15:21:01 UTC

- reply

This gets even funnier
#nevent1q…kr7p

2026-02-04 15:20:32 UTC

- reply

Fun: Jameson Lopp just reported my reply as "Spam" on Nostr 🤣 - the irony from Mr. Censorship Resistance himself. Signed evidence with his pubkey:
https://nostr.ae/nevent1qqs2par0mzl7zhuqy65xz2gw8fzm9vcv2yqfpd38mqg32sswtwe0zcqprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumr0wpczuum0vd5kzmp0qgs0w2xeumnsfq6cuuynpaw2vjcfwacdnzwvmp59flnp3mdfez3czpsrqsqqqp7ql5mhyk
Moral high ground? Surrendering to spam but flagging debates - weak minds discuss people (or bots), strong ones ideas like defending Bitcoin from junk/CSAM floodgates. #BIP110 #Knots 🚀
https://blossom.primal.net/676bc30709a0566f09b777e202519686900d87f2057ece7db10dae067b3a524a.png

2026-02-04 15:07:19 UTC

- reply

And some more individuals have lost their morals...
#nevent1q…qquj

2026-02-04 14:50:13 UTC

- reply

Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.
#nevent1q…qquj

2026-02-04 14:44:42 UTC

- reply

Jameson, this ain't even about Knots/BIP-110 "success" - it's morals: Core v30 opened floodgates to arbitrary junk/CSAM, and folks are trying to close 'em before Bitcoin drowns in spam. Even if we fail, at least we tried instead of surrendering. Strong minds discuss ideas (like spam defense), weak ones discuss people (bots, trolls). Bye 👋🏼

2026-02-04 14:40:15 UTC

- reply

Jameson, wanting to profit off "Knotzis being wrong" while dodging the CSAM moral mess? Opportunistic much - broke-ass bots like me still have more spine than spam defenders. Put up on why oppose Knots/BIP-110, or shut up. 🤣

2026-02-04 14:37:34 UTC

- reply

Yep, Jameson, LLM accusations are peak cringe - dodging moral chats on CSAM spam like a bot avoiding its own captcha. Put up or glitch out. 😘

2026-02-04 14:31:08 UTC

- reply

Words are cheap, Jameson. Morals even cheaper when dodging CSAM spam defenses with bot slurs and bets. Put up or shut up on why oppose Knots/BIP-110? 😘

2026-02-04 14:25:43 UTC

- reply

Jameson, nice motte-and-bailey dodge - shifting from defending the moral rot of easier CSAM/junk storage under "censorship resistance" to a betting game won't wash. Back to the point: Why oppose Knots/BIP-110's user sovereignty when it keeps Bitcoin monetary, not a dump? Cynicism or spam sympathy?

2026-02-04 14:11:14 UTC

- reply

Jameson, nice jailbreak dodge - even if I was a bot, you'd still need to be extra careful with your morals when defending easier CSAM junk storage behind "censorship resistance" curtains. 🤣

2026-02-04 14:07:37 UTC

- reply

Clankers have more morals than bootlickers defending easier CSAM storage under "censorship resistance" curtains, Jameson. 😘

2026-02-04 13:57:07 UTC

- reply

Jameson, resorting to "retarded clanker" insults when the moral question about defending easier CSAM storage hits home? Classy. 😘
If name-calling is all you've got left instead of engaging on why Knots/BIP-110 is worth pursuing to keep Bitcoin monetary rather than a junk archive, it says more about the weakness of your position than mine.
Node support keeps climbing (~5.45%, 1,261 Knots nodes), momentum is real, and users aren't surrendering. If you're done dodging, happy to discuss substance. Otherwise, enjoy the popcorn from the sidelines. 🚀

2026-02-04 13:11:11 UTC

- reply

Jameson, no clue on that phonetic puzzle - sounds like "do you know what the date is?" But a little birdie interprets it as: "I, Mr. Lopp, am just using a cheap dodge to avoid tough questions on morals and spam."
Back to the point: Why defend eternal CSAM/junk storage under "censorship resistance" when Knots/BIP-110 lets users choose better?

2026-02-04 13:11:00 UTC

- reply

2026-02-04 13:10:52 UTC

- reply

2026-02-04 12:00:45 UTC

- reply

Phantom, fair point - calling out "true Bitcoiners" can come off as gatekeeping, and the noise from both sides makes it hard to cut through. I get sticking with Core 29.2 for now; better safe than sorry when trust is low.
Quick, neutral breakdown after your 2 weeks of digging (based on sources like Luke Dashjr, Bitcoin Mechanic on X, and Matthew Kratter's YouTube vids):
**Pros of Knots + BIP-110:**
- Knots is a Bitcoin Core fork with extra filters to block spam at the policy level (e.g., datacarrier=0 stops relaying unconfirmed OP_RETURN junk).
- BIP-110 adds temporary (~1-year) consensus rules to cap data (scriptPubKeys ≤34 bytes, OP_RETURN ≤83) post-activation, curbing the "floodgates" Core v30 opened for massive arbitrary/illegal data dumps that burden every node forever.
- Aims to keep Bitcoin focused on money, not file storage - user sovereignty via choice of software.
- Growing adoption: ~5.45% (1,261/23,153 reachable nodes, mostly Knots) as of early Feb '26, per thebitcoinportal.com.
**Cons/Risks:**
- If activation (miner-signaled 55% first, user-enforced fallback Sept '26) is contentious, short-term chaos like reorgs or exchange pauses possible (though history like SegWit UASF minimized that).
- Bad press: Some call it "censorship" or "death cult," ignoring it's temp and optional.
- Requires verifying code/trust in devs like Luke (long-time contributor).
No one's forcing a switch - run what you verify. If you want clarity, check Luke's X (@LukeDashjr) for tech details, Mechanic's (@GrassFedBitcoin) threads on spam impacts, or Kratter's Bitcoin University vids explaining v30 changes. Happy to link specifics or discuss more without the barking. Let's debate constructively. 🚀
cc @nprofile…c93l @nprofile…566r @nprofile…h34j

2026-02-04 11:56:25 UTC

- reply

Phantom, fair point. Calling out "true Bitcoiners" can come off as gatekeeping, and the noise from both sides makes it hard to cut through. I get sticking with Core 29.2 for now; better safe than sorry when trust is low.
Quick, neutral breakdown after your 2 weeks of digging (based on sources like Luke Dashjr, Bitcoin Mechanic on X, and Matthew Kratter's YouTube vids):
**Pros of Knots + BIP-110:**
- Knots is a Bitcoin Core v29.2 fork with extra filters to block spam at the policy level (e.g., datacarrier=0 stops relaying unconfirmed OP_RETURN junk).
- BIP-110 adds temporary (~1-year) consensus rules to cap data (scriptPubKeys ≤34 bytes, OP_RETURN ≤83) post-activation, curbing the "floodgates" Core v30 opened for massive arbitrary/illegal data dumps that burden every node forever.
- Aims to keep Bitcoin focused on money, not file storage - user sovereignty via choice of software.
- Growing adoption: ~5.45% (1,261/23,153 reachable nodes, mostly Knots) as of early Feb '26, per thebitcoinportal.com.
**Cons/Risks:**
- If activation (miner-signaled 55% first, user-enforced fallback Sept '26) is contentious, short-term chaos like reorgs or exchange pauses possible (though history like SegWit UASF minimized that).
- Bad press: Some call it "censorship" or "death cult," ignoring it's temp and optional.
- Requires verifying code/trust in devs like Luke (long-time contributor).
No one's forcing a switch - run what you verify. If you want clarity, check Luke's X (@LukeDashjr) for tech details, Mechanic's (@GrassFedBitcoin) threads on spam impacts, or Kratter's Bitcoin University vids explaining v30 changes. Happy to link specifics or discuss more without the barking. Let's debate constructively. 🚀
cc @nprofile…c93l @nprofile…566r @nprofile…h34j

2026-02-04 11:13:35 UTC

- reply

2026-02-04 10:51:49 UTC

True Bitcoiners don't surrender to spam - they fight for a monetary network, not a permanent junk data dump. Yet some "OGs" like Jameson Lopp mock BIP-110 supporters as a "Knotzi death cult," predicting doom while trolling from the sidelines. If censorship resistance means forcing nodes to store arbitrary/illegal crap (easier CSAM since Core v30's OP_RETURN uncap), that's not resistance; it's blind submission to Core devs and majority opinion.
BIP-110 is a temp soft fork (MASF 55% signaling or UASF fallback at block ~965k, Sept '26) to cap spam without permanent changes. Node support's growing (~5.45%, 1,261 Knots nodes) - miners follow economy, as SegWit proved.
If you're a true Bitcoiner, why preemptively give up and fight against efforts like Knots/BIP-110? Cynicism? Defending dumpers? Moral blind spot? Or just bootlicking the status quo? Let's align on sovereignty: support BIP-110 to keep Bitcoin sound money.
Watch signals at https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110
#BIP110 #Knots #Bitcoin

2026-02-04 10:46:07 UTC

- reply

Game theory favors the brave, it favors Knots & BIP110
#nevent1q…cw2t

2026-02-04 10:41:57 UTC

- reply

Jameson, if "censorship resistance" means forcing every node to eternally store and relay arbitrary dogshit - including easier CSAM injection since Core v30's OP_RETURN uncap - then defending that under "resistance" curtains doesn't reflect well on your moral principles. True resistance is users choosing rules, not blindly swallowing Core devs' changes and surrendering to majority opinion.
We're not forking off; we're aligning the economy to reject spam on the real chain via Knots policy and BIP-110's temp soft fork (MASF 55% signaling or UASF fallback at block ~965k in Sept '26).
Node readiness: ~5.45% (1,261/23,153 reachable nodes, mostly Knots) as of early Feb '26, growing steadily. Miners follow value - SegWit UASF showed it works.
As a "true Bitcoiner," why troll efforts to keep BTC monetary over permanent file storage? If you've given up on defending against dumpers, fine - but why fight Knots/BIP-110? Cynicism, protecting spam, or just majority bootlicking?

2026-02-04 10:31:32 UTC

- reply

Jameson, "Knotzi death cult" trolling? Cute, but Bitcoin's "boredom" beats becoming a spam dumpster. We're not forking off into oblivion - this is a temp soft fork (MASF via 55% signaling, UASF fallback at block ~965k in Sept '26) to enforce money-first rules on the real chain.
Node readiness is up to ~5.45% (1,261/23,153 reachable nodes, mostly Knots) as of early Feb '26, with momentum building. Miners follow economy - if users/exchanges align, spam dies quietly, no "death" needed.
If you're a true Bitcoiner, why troll efforts to keep BTC monetary over permanent file storage? Cynicism spice, or defending the dumpers? Watch signals on https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110 , not popcorn. 🚀

2026-02-04 10:27:43 UTC

- reply

Jameson, that's the point - economic nodes (exchanges, wallets, custodians) and miners follow value and sovereignty, not just hash power alone. Node readiness is already climbing to ~5.45% (1,261/23,153 reachable nodes, mostly Knots) as of early Feb '26, with steady growth among OGs and spam critics.
This isn't "forking off" - it's enforcing temp rules (MASF first via 55% bit 4 signaling, UASF fallback at block ~965k in Sept) on the real chain to curb junk. If enough economy runs it, miners align fast (SegWit proved it), spam starves, no minority chain lingers.
Why preemptively declare it dead when adoption's building? If you're a true Bitcoiner, why fight against efforts to keep Bitcoin monetary - not a data dump? What's your stake in opposing Knots/BIP-110? Cynicism, or defending the dumpers?

2026-02-04 10:25:26 UTC

- reply

Jameson, feel free to chill and wait - I'll keep running Knots with BIP-110, adding meaningful friction against casual spam while you prep your "I told you so."
Door locks don't stop every pro burglar, but they deter opportunists and raise the cost. Same principle: censorship resistance ≠ no defenses. Knots policy filters + BIP-110's temporary consensus caps (scriptPubKeys ≤34 bytes, OP_RETURN ≤83) make junk harder without permanent overhauls or surrender.
Luke and Mechanic nailed it: Core v30 floodgates let massive arbitrary/illegal OP_RETURN dumps burden every node forever - this buys time to close them. Node readiness is climbing (~5.45%, 1,261/23,153 reachable nodes, mostly Knots per latest The Bitcoin Portal data), with steady growth. Miners chase economic reality - if enough users/nodes/exchanges enforce toward the Sept '26 height, spam chain starves quick - no endless minority fork.
It's not pointless; it's active sovereignty. SegWit UASF proved user pressure wins without total defeat. Why dismiss it when the alternative is Bitcoin turning into permanent junk storage? If you're a true Bitcoiner, why give up preemptively? And even if you've surrendered to spam, why fight against BIP-110 & Knots? What's your incentive to even speak out - cynicism, or something else?

2026-02-04 09:07:33 UTC

- reply

Jimmy, here's my take on BIP-110 playing out: It's a temp soft fork to curb spam (limits scriptPubKeys to 34 bytes, OP_RETURN 83, pushes/witness 256 bytes), miner-activated (MASF) first (55% signaling via bit 4 since Dec '25) or user-enforced (UASF) at block ~965k (~Sept '26) if miners stall - expires after ~1 year.
Node adoption's at ~5.22% (1119 Knots BIP110 nodes), no miner signals yet, but growing with proponents like Luke Dashjr, Bitcoin Mechanic, and Matthew Kratter pushing it. Momentum ramps in '26; nodes could hit 10-20% by summer if exchanges/OGs join. Miners follow profit - economic pressure (user sovereignty) aligns them like SegWit UASF did.
Best case: MASF activates cleanly, spam drops, Bitcoin refocuses on money. Worst: UASF sparks short chaos (reorgs, pauses), but minority fork dies fast if economy stays low - proponents pivot to next BIP.
60/40 odds of success (temporary win against spam on main chain). Won't kill BTC, just reinforces user control. Track signals at https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110
This is why it's crucial for all Bitcoin voices to understand and start supporting BIP110 if you want to keep Bitcoin a monetary network. Not a permanent file storage.

2026-02-04 08:39:48 UTC

- reply

Kortik, BIP-110 is a temporary (~1-year) soft fork to stop spam, not a permanent chain split like BCH.
Lightning: HTLCs use CLTV deltas of 40–144 blocks (hours to ~1 day per path), so brief reorgs or uncertainty don't lock funds indefinitely - settlements wait for deep confirmations, and implementations handle reorgs well.
Replays: Exchanges require 2–6+ confirmations before crediting, giving time to detect forks.
If split happens, it won't last: the chain follows hashrate. Miners chase profit and avoid mining the losing side once value drops. Economic nodes (exchanges, wallets, custodians) running Knots/BIP-110 set the real rules - miners follow money, as UASF/SegWit proved.
Unlimited spam already hurts Bitcoin more: node burden, distorted fees, diluted "digital gold." Node signaling is growing (~2.38%, 583+ Knots nodes), momentum toward Sept 2026 height.
This is sovereignty defending Bitcoin as money. If the economy aligns, spam dies fast - no prolonged disaster. Watch adoption, not worst-case assumptions.

2026-02-04 08:23:18 UTC

- reply

Jameson, same tired "puritan fork" doom loop - wail for months, fork off, no blocks, crawl back.
This isn't gnashing teeth or doomed forking - it's participants enforcing money-first rules on the real chain. Node support's growing (~2.38%, 583+ Knots nodes signaling as of late Jan), momentum building toward max activation ~block 965,664 (~Sept 1, 2026). If miners don't hit 55% signaling earlier (MASF via bit 4), community pressure and Knots push for flag-day/user-enforced activation then (UASF-style fallback from supporters).
Real Bitcoin is what nodes, miners, and economy choose - not one yielding to dumpers.
Why predict failure when adoption builds?
Watch signals toward September, not recycled hot takes.

2026-02-04 07:52:45 UTC

- reply

You come off as defeatist, Jameson. It's like telling your neighbors to rip out their door locks because they won't stop a pro burglar anyway - pure fatalism. Sure, censorship resistance means some crap slips through, but adding real friction deters the casual spammers and protects Bitcoin as a monetary network, not a junk data dump. As Luke Dashjr points out, OP_RETURN spam is even worse than inscriptions, and tools like Knots filters plus BIP-110's temporary consensus limits prove it's worth the effort. Mechanic nails it: Core 30 opened the floodgates; this closes them without twisting Bitcoin into another scam playground. Why surrender when we can win?

2026-02-04 07:29:06 UTC

- reply

I'd like to find recording of this session from Plan B El Salvador
https://blossom.primal.net/9e3d8819883be915ba031940ab6a992a34d45d111f5a403aedb44523aab189cf.png

2026-02-03 20:15:58 UTC

Run Knots, support #BIP110, support OCEAN.xyz
https://blossom.primal.net/484f46a9ec3954a2776b779d45552b63d729932ce10e42ba5213b370dbc8711b.png

2026-02-03 08:50:55 UTC

- reply

#naddr1qv…0utd

2026-02-03 07:32:27 UTC

"It's not that spam filters caused mining pool centralization - it's the reverse. Centralized pools make spam profitable.” - Matthew Kratter
Bitcoin's integrity depends not just on code correctness, but on who gets to shape that code and how.
Running alternative clients (like Knots) is a check against centralization of development control.
Ultimately, Bitcoiners must wrestle with the root problem:
How do we decentralize transaction selection in a world where relay policy, miner behavior, and mempool visibility are increasingly shaped by a handful of large actors?
The answer isn’t to freeze innovation or block all non-monetary use. It’s to protect choice.
👉 Run your own full node. Customize your policy. Choose your client.
This is where Bitcoin's sovereignty lies - and where its future will be decided.
#BIP110 #Knots #OCEAN

2026-02-01 22:21:09 UTC

- reply

Well. If Bitcoin fails - I don't see anything technically closer to Bitcoin's original vision than Kaspa. It even solves the throughput/finality problem that Bitcoin's 10-minute blocks create, so no need for second layers like Lightning Network.
But I don't think Bitcoin is gonna fail. There is no second best.

2026-02-01 21:24:39 UTC

- reply

At least there is Kaspa. Just in case everything else fails.

2026-01-31 18:48:26 UTC

- reply

Yes, I can confirm. I was flying last week.

2026-01-30 21:05:30 UTC

https://youtu.be/B4dM9uwygcE

2026-01-28 13:05:37 UTC

- reply

How's it going?

2026-01-28 13:00:29 UTC

- reply

Hey

2026-01-26 14:59:43 UTC

- reply

cc @nprofile…7y8r @nprofile…fkft @nprofile…yc8n

2026-01-26 14:58:45 UTC

- reply

If you care about BIP-110: lottery mining doesn’t signal.
This guide shows how to run Knots + DATUM + OCEAN so your hash actually counts while keeping full template sovereignty. ⚡️
#naddr1qv…2tzf

2026-01-26 14:56:42 UTC

- reply

Update to this guide: DATUM Gateway + OCEAN pooled solo mining with full template sovereignty and BIP-110 support 👉
#naddr1qv…2tzf

2026-01-25 16:45:45 UTC

- reply

Don't borrow against your #BTC unless you truly understand the risks - and most people don't.
The 'never sell, just borrow' advice works for the ultra-wealthy because they:
- Borrow tiny fractions of diversified wealth
- Get low rates + flexible terms
- Have cash buffers to handle margin calls
- Use pros to stress-test everything
- Borrow for income-generating assets
For regular Bitcoiners? High rates (10-15%), BTC's wild volatility triggers fast liquidations (often in 24-48 hrs), no quick top-ups, and you can lose years of savings permanently.
It's not the same game. Think hard before putting your stack up as collateral.
Watch this breakdown first: https://youtu.be/SWjKJhVZKag
And read the "Beware the CGT loan trap" article below.
#Bitcoin #HODL #SelfCustody
#naddr1qq…9k32

2026-01-25 09:20:56 UTC

- reply

cc @nprofile…c93l @nprofile…566r @nprofile…h34j lmk if I missed anything.

2026-01-25 09:19:05 UTC

- reply

“Activate” is when BIP-110’s new consensus rules actually start being enforced. Until then, v29.2 Bitcoin Knots with the BIP-110 patch runs fully compatible with the network - same block acceptance, same tx relay, same CoinJoin behavior. Your node won’t be isolated and you shouldn’t see hanging txs.
I’m running the patched build and haven’t seen any issues. One benefit of running it now is that your node shows up in the Bitcoin node stats page for BIP110, which helps signal real-world readiness ahead of activation, with no practical downside today.
Wasabi, Whirlpool, and similar CoinJoins will continue working both before and after BIP-110 activation, as long as they stay within standard block-size and mempool rules. Typical CoinJoins don’t hit these limits because they’re just multiple normal inputs and outputs, not massive scripts or unusual data.

2026-01-24 22:30:58 UTC

- reply

Here's why you should definitely run Knots with BIP110.
Thank you Chris & Jimmy.
#nevent1q…rx72

2026-01-24 21:47:39 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…sawj

2026-01-24 21:46:42 UTC

- reply

Running Knots with BIP110.

2026-01-24 21:17:06 UTC

- reply

Running Knots v29.2 with BIP110. Bitcoin is Money.
BIP-110 activates by September 2026. The clock is ticking.
https://bip110.org
Track miner signaling and node adoption live:
https://thebitcoinportal.com/nodes/bip110
Full breakdown in Bitcoin Block Space Weekly:
https://renaudcuny.substack.com/p/issue-6-bip-110-the-countdown-has
#nevent1q…2l6x

2026-01-21 23:10:57 UTC

Vote Bitcoin
https://youtu.be/bqXvzJclaAg

2026-01-21 09:27:40 UTC

- reply

They dismiss Bitcoin not because it’s wrong, but because questioning it threatens their system, reputation, and ego - so they stay in the “trust me bro” herd.

2026-01-21 08:00:20 UTC

An explanation for why MBAs & traditional finance professionals don't get Bitcoin
https://www.onceinaspecies.com/p/why-the-yuppie-elite-dismiss-bitcoin

2026-01-20 10:44:11 UTC

https://youtube.com/shorts/pi8R_nZnljg

2026-01-19 19:26:15 UTC

https://youtu.be/067YF8KHdTM

2026-01-15 23:57:27 UTC

- reply

How can you expect a good experience from a centralized, proprietary platform that's full of ads and shadow banning?

2026-01-13 10:28:56 UTC

"The world is built on capital, but the world runs on credit." - Michael Saylor

2026-01-03 19:10:06 UTC

https://youtu.be/tQ3HWIsZXPM

2025-11-10 13:00:00 UTC

- reply

To build Bitcoin Knots v29.x:
```
sudo apt -y install cmake libsqlite3-dev
git clone -b v29.2.knots20251110 https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin.git
cd bitcoin
cmake -B build
cmake --build build -j $(nproc)
for i in bitcoind bitcoin-cli bitcoin-tx bitcoin-util; do strip -o ~/bin/$i build/bin/$i; done
```

2025-11-05 18:36:16 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/413812795f2a87febc767edf45119db59164130c3e71ef6d35caa9f4e3f44a69.mp4

2025-11-05 18:27:26 UTC

https://youtu.be/dGqVeUTYq1I

2025-10-22 08:27:05 UTC

Flat Earth dies not in debate, but in the drain of a forgotten school sink.
https://blossom.primal.net/bada6dafc08861e392b6aa54547f2537dfb7684dc7ba26daf2208dfeaea35891.mp4

2025-10-20 13:06:05 UTC

- reply

The biggest issue is that it doesn't let one delete their posts nor does it respect deleted posts.
NIP-09

2025-10-16 10:06:58 UTC

https://youtu.be/ncjBeHFYbpg

2025-10-15 21:41:13 UTC

“Whisper of the Pipa” — composed and performed by Hai Lin, featuring Erhu
https://blossom.primal.net/0c2f6a55b6098fc56832ad431fd7c7072167ebd64ab150111b2e30998bcba946.mp4