LeoWandersleb
Leo Wandersleb

https://walletscrutiny.com

https://nostr.info

Working on Bitcoin, Nostr and being a good dad.

Public Key

npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsydl97xpj74udw0qg5vkfyujyjxd3l706jd0t0w0turp93d0vvungpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs7amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6qgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5q3gamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvqgawaehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2aqjthh6p

Publishing to

nostr-pub.wellorder.net

Author Public Key

npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-02 13:39:56 UTC

- reply

How can I watch this thread? I want to know what people use. @npub1xts…kk5s built his own tool and is super happy with that, claiming insane productivity. If it's available, I'd also like to try that out.
That said, I'm making progress giving sub-agents roles but it comes at a price. My token burn rate is through the roof. But I'm still spending significantly more on humans than on LLMs, so ... it's a tiny roof so to speak.

2026-02-27 15:32:13 UTC

#nevent1q…d7nj
It's all so tiring. The human race is literally at the singularity and it doesn't matter if super-intelligent AI is a year out or three. Why are we still fighting over who owns which speck of dirt to the point of nuclear Armageddon?
If we hang in here some ten more years, we might be reaching out to the stars! We are on track for an age of unbelievable abundance! In 20 years we will have warp drives getting generational ships to new frontiers we now can only dream of.

2026-02-27 03:07:55 UTC

- reply

Measuring productivity in net lines of code sounds like a recipe for maintenance hell. But the next LLM can probably reduce your bloated code without breaking anything.

2026-02-26 15:50:52 UTC

- reply

I don't want to use a browser extension to not expose my private keys to more devices and software than absolutely necessary.
My internet is flaky here, so that might be part of the problem.
Showing me accounts that are logged in but still me somehow being logged out is weird. If Jumble knows that Leo is logged in by some account, can't it just go with that and load Leo's stuff? When I want to sign stuff and don't have Leo's keys ready that should be a different issue. Jumble needs an npub to load that npub's account. Nothing more.

2026-02-19 21:37:38 UTC

- reply

Is botfather yours? 5.5 million users?
https://npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6.blossom.band/c7619badc6995eded68c52ad46997a10fc4b26fb05db6cf9ee0ef5c58ed3e990.jpg

2026-02-14 16:02:07 UTC

- reply

You could have cured cancer or ...

2026-02-13 16:27:42 UTC

- reply

Probably not but even if they were only 17, what's wrong about them being exited about meeting a Core developer? I wish even smaller kids would be excited about outstanding engineers instead of musicians or TV actors.
I know kids that knew all the local VIPs and told me about them like in the meme when they were 15. In an icecream parlor ... "He's the brother of that football player. He had an affair with ..." 🤦‍♂️

2026-02-11 16:40:15 UTC

- reply

Eat more babies! It somehow appears to be good for the DOW.

2026-02-10 21:31:37 UTC

- reply

You assume modern spammers are cost-sensitive? They are not. They are hype-sensitive. High fees don't deter them. They validate the "asset" value and drive the FOMO cycles they rely on.
You also completely sidestepped the timescale mismatch. A consensus change like BIP110 takes months or years to activate safely. A spammer can change their encoding method in an afternoon. That is not "asymmetry favoring the defender". That is a losing battle by definition.
BIP110 asks us to risk catastrophic chain splits and break legitimate scripting utility (like OP_IF) just to play whack-a-mole with data that pays valid fees. If we normalize censoring transactions at the consensus level, we won't kill the spam - we’ll kill Bitcoin’s neutrality for a false sense of control.

2026-02-10 21:14:00 UTC

- reply

If Core would be doing anything I would consider dangerous on a technical level, I would agree with you but they got other stuff to do than to not be arrogant to the 10000th clown coming out of the woods complaining about something that was debated for years. If you just now learned about some superficial details about how bitcoin development is done, you don't have the privilege to demand them caring about your opinion.

2026-02-10 16:02:09 UTC

- reply

Well, the most concerning part so far is that Adam didn't deny being Andy. I wish he would be clear and forthcoming about not having visited Epstein Island but even if he did, bip110 would be wrong, which is your main beef here.

2026-02-07 15:32:03 UTC

- reply

Brutal punishment. The guillotine is gentle in comparison.

2026-02-07 01:28:30 UTC

- reply

Checking mine once a year ...
Not sure why close it.

2026-02-06 22:17:57 UTC

Who here is running OpenClaw ... in a container ... with nostr extension ... and @nprofile…4u96 ?
I failed so far. It claims duplicate nostr plugin detected, I had to use socat to get the web interface and the I get errors about No API key found for provider "anthropic". even though I used ppq's config block. So frustrating. I wish I had an agent to fix it.

2026-02-06 17:38:25 UTC

- reply

so ... no actual bitcoins moved and the exchange rolled it all back? oopsie but no biggie in the end.

2026-02-06 15:53:35 UTC

Epstein and his clients aren't just "pedophiles" in that they derive arousal from dominating kids. They are dominating all of us.
It's not only about justice for these kids.
This is about self defense!
#nevent1q…l6y8

2026-02-06 03:16:29 UTC

- reply

It's a limited (4 days?) PR stunt.

2026-02-05 21:43:54 UTC

- reply

But to drop the price, somebody must be short selling which in itself comes with a huge risk 🤷‍♂️

2026-02-05 20:41:17 UTC

- reply

Unfortunately that's how paranoia works. A perceived threat can't be accepted as a disagreement.

2026-02-05 00:00:04 UTC

- reply

Bitcoiners are disagreeable and paranoid. What did you expect?
Or do you think some people pleasers could pull this off and not get totally owned by some psychopaths?

2026-02-04 11:53:51 UTC

- reply

nhash?

2026-02-04 06:41:52 UTC

Was Epstein involved in the Plandemic? 👀
https://x.com/i/status/2018374717426503946

2026-02-04 04:25:02 UTC

- reply

The ultimate luxury will always be sovereignty.

2026-02-04 03:34:39 UTC

- reply

I explicitly mentioned t-tag which is what #tags use.

2026-02-03 22:40:53 UTC

#nevent1q…nayg
I see how it could be implemented with some mod team but the entry point could be a "sub owner" but with overlapping subs.
Alice likes Bitcoin and goes to nostr/Bitcoin (kind-11 with t-tag=Bitcoin) but there's a lot of spam and "spam", so she decides to clean up the space. She reacts with ✅ and 🚩 to approve or block.
n/Bitcoin gets too busy, so Alice invites Bob on her team. She updates her moderation (d-tag bitcoin) file to include Bob.
Charlie disagrees with Alice on how to moderate and builds their own moderation team.
Now people can choose to see n/Bitcoin, Alice/n/Bitcoin or Charlie/n/Bitcoin.
But how about voting? To make the system work for people new to nostr, voting works through who Alice or Charlie follow. The strongest votes are Alice and Charlie's and then come their follows and their follows' follows.
Votes are +1 and -1 but anybody can ✅ and 🚩 mark posts and replies, suggesting the moderator copy their marking or maybe add them as moderators to instantly give weight to their markings for all others.
So your client would not show posts you marked with 🚩. It works as an instant hide. Your client lets you delegate approval/blocking to others or others and their teams.
Voting/approval/blocking could be weighted using my follows, Alice's follows, a mix of Alice's and Charlie's follows, the different mod teams, ... The client could decide to never consider blocks that are not my blocks or treat new posts as blocked, too until approved.
This feels like the simplest logic that might actually work and post collection could start with the sub "owners". Get Alice, Alice's team, all the team's approvals and referenced kind-11 posts, all their follows and their votes.

2026-02-03 17:51:49 UTC

- reply

AI always tends to produce overly theatric audio but the video looks convincing.

2026-02-03 17:48:42 UTC

Amir Taki was a friend of Jeffrey Epstein? Other Bitcoiners on Epstein Island? WTF?
#nevent1q…uzle

2026-02-02 03:15:23 UTC

- reply

WhiteNoise does private groups and should work well with public relays. Non-group-members should learn nothing about group conversation or whether a message is from one group or another. Other standards use less crypto but promise privacy through relays keeping details private. I clearly prefer the former approach.

2026-02-02 02:47:38 UTC

- reply

For these public topic groups I agree. As long as clients can receive all the events of a topic, they can mirror the relay in case moderation gets out of hands.

2026-02-02 02:31:58 UTC

- reply

I try to sway influencers towards a concept where relays are just some sort of ether that allows us to broadcast events (together with relays getting paid for the physical and legal burden of delivering these messages ideally on a per-CPU-cycle basis, anonymously) and fear big clients might embrace, extend and extinguish core properties of nostr by driving monolithic relay use.
I can't dictate the way but I can make some noise to warn of dangers of centralizing relay use patterns. I just don't want people to celebrate a moderation team in a stack that makes it hard to avoid their moderation.

2026-02-02 02:21:39 UTC

- reply

The only way I see to make moderated relays palatable to me is if they allow mirroring all events to a backup relay. So if relay A censors valid opinions on r/Bitcoin again, relay B can serve the same topic with different policy and take over those who get censored at A. People agreeing with this moderation can remain at A but people at B won't miss out on all the other notes that aren't censored at A.
Ideally clients would allow following topics on more than one relay at a time.

2026-02-02 01:42:34 UTC

- reply

So if I create a small group, it will remain a small group and perform poorly when it grows to 10k users? No transition logic to big group? Makes sense.

2026-02-02 01:34:19 UTC

- reply

Thanks! That sounds a lot more complicated. So in Keychat when you add a third person to the chat, you switch from Signal chat to Signal group chat and when the tenth joins you switch to MLS? That also looks a bit complicated and spicy to implement without surprises for the users especially if each tier works slightly different.
If MLS does work for 10000 users, it surely does for 2 or not? How consistent are these groups on a non-consistent protocol like nostr?

2026-02-02 01:25:11 UTC

- reply

I don't mind having moderation but it should not happen at the "ether" level as spam is not well defined generally. On r/Bitcoin, talking about block size was "spam" and I understand that many people see it that way but a considerable percentage of the users of Reddit did not and that produced a ton of friction.
I want relays to filter spam (the CSAM and stuff according to what they feel comfortable hosting) but the topic forum should not rely on only one such relay. For finer grain spam filtering like "talk about block size", users should have client side filters and those filters can leverage third party classification but if I want the firehose, let me have it.
The moderators at r/Bitcoin massively influenced discussion. You could maybe argue they fabricated consensus. I don't want a small group to have that kind of power again. Not on nostr.

2026-02-02 01:05:48 UTC

- reply

I want to fight spam at the periphery. Let them spam into the void. I won't see a single of their messages.

2026-02-02 00:54:59 UTC

- reply

Nope. I actually think the analogy "moderated relays are platforms" is exactly right.
And yes, websites, blogs and podcasts are platforms, too. So what? For **my** website, **my** blog or **my** podcast I might choose to host my own "platform" but I don't want to contribute to a social network that is at the discretion of some server admin.
Bitcoin Twitter felt like a free marketplace most of the time for most users. r/Bitcoin less so. Both could have been much worse and I don't want to contribute thousands of messages to some dumpster fire to happen in a year or three. If I happen to disagree with whoever is in charge of moderating the relay by then, I can bootstrap my alternative "moderated relay" with zero users? No thanks.

2026-02-02 00:46:23 UTC

- reply

kind-11 also has a topic. It's implemented as a t-tag. Try it out at https://jumble.imwald.eu/discussions/notes/1a09f4e23ef74f9b296f83cf265647b2785a227c558cbd0bcc7f91e114703419

2026-02-02 00:26:57 UTC

- reply

What's its funding? Didn't know it had any.

2026-02-02 00:24:08 UTC

- reply

Moderated relays are platforms. I'm on nostr to use and seek protocol solutions not platforms with alternative clients.

2026-02-02 00:19:04 UTC

- reply

Still, open subredits had pretty much a public audience and while I agree that Twitter-like clients shouldn't be mixed with Reddit-like clients, using a different kind might be all it takes.
TIL about kind-11 clients and I'm bullish on those even though I drew hate from two of its proponents 🤷‍♂️

2026-02-01 23:24:33 UTC

- reply

Hmm... I'm trying to figure out what's the merit of each of these projects.
Claude claimed there was a reference to marmot, not only mls, in the code of keychat. I can't find any. Grrr.
To me, whitenoise sounds simpler and more targeted for integration in more clients.
Also searching for "mls chat nostr" on duckduck or google brings up a lot of white noise but almost no keychat. There's others but WN appears to dominate right now.

2026-02-01 21:17:06 UTC

TIL: keychat implemented marmot protocol, too but isn't compatible with whitenoise?

2026-02-01 21:14:06 UTC

- reply

I'm very confused. You did read messages before replying, did you? I did explicitly state that I was working on paid relays and I want them to exist but that doesn't mean you get to dictate that I owe **you** money because you did some work creating such a relay. The idea that work deserves payment is actually a communist idea. Paying for features that resolve problems is more in line with my ideology.

2026-02-01 21:02:41 UTC

- reply

What? You wrote about petitioning and "we" and "they". Those are not concepts I understand if you don't name names. There is no committee in charge around here that you need to petition. I assume your rude reply was because you are indeed a developer? But why would you petition if you're a dev? You can just do stuff on nostr. I'm confused.

2026-02-01 20:56:27 UTC

- reply

I care about follower counts actually. But not in this intransparent way it's implemented in some clients right now. I want to see the back-follower count of first, second and third degree.
On nostr it's relatively quick to find all my follows, their follows and their follows. That's what I would consider most relevant accounts. If they all follow me, awesome! If a million others follow me? I couldn't care less.
I want a client that surfaces first what my follows authored and then what they re-posted/liked/zapped/commented but when things get crowded, I wouldn't want to see reactions or replies from people outside of this circle.

2026-02-01 20:51:45 UTC

- reply

I'm pretty sure there's a misunderstanding here but you do you. Good luck blocking me on nostr.

2026-02-01 20:49:01 UTC

- reply

kind-11 might just be enough. @npub1m4n…c2jl and others are working on that, so I'd promote and use it for now.

2026-02-01 19:15:29 UTC

- reply

So I guess you're not a dev and did vibe code now?
Please name names. Who refused to build it and why should they listen to your petition in the first place? That's not how open source or nips for that matter work.
I'm now using jumble\.social to reply to all these comments as imwald didn't work too well with the relay selection.

2026-02-01 19:02:43 UTC

- reply

Which big apps don't want it? The biggest apps don't make money from marketing as far as I can tell. Damus and Amethyst? No need to antagonize them.

2026-02-01 19:00:53 UTC

- reply

Do you think I owe you money because you spent time on whatever you did?

2026-02-01 18:59:55 UTC

- reply

It's bizarr to me you would say such a thing.
I want paid relays and I have open bounties to build such relays that charge per use, incentive aligned with the payer and the relay provider.
If your vision of relay-moderated nostr ends up being the only one, then nostr failed.

2026-02-01 18:57:43 UTC

- reply

It's a centralized platform isn't it? If they can censor my notes, I'm not interested.

2026-02-01 18:56:52 UTC

- reply

... that means one relay per person. Not at all the vision of relays I have.
Relays to me are the ether through which we broadcast events. If the broadcast doesn't have enough reach, add more or better relays. End of story. To filter at the relay level - unless it's my personal relay that I use to receive events - is only enabling censorship by limiting reach.

2026-02-01 18:54:49 UTC

- reply

Not ... yet ;)

2026-02-01 18:52:37 UTC

- reply

I don't want the same outcome as reddit. Reddit is terrible now. I think we can do better by pushing the "moderation" to algorithmic moderation on the client side.
On Reddit r/Bitcoin has one sorting for everybody, so when hords of noobs flood in, OGs get totally bored. On nostr you could have a completely different list of top-voted posts for noobs than for OGs depending on who they connect with.

2026-02-01 18:49:36 UTC

- reply

My journey in Bitcoin - and I think that others had the same experience - was from Bitcoin Talk forum which was topic-centric to Reddit to Twitter and then to nostr. Many skipped Reddit but Reddit was much better at surfacing interesting content than Twitter. On Twitter, all tweets revolve around the current thing and on Reddit, if 12 top posts appeared about the current thing, most people down-voted or ignored the second and later posts, keeping the page one of a topic much more diverse than Twitter or nostr.

2026-02-01 18:45:21 UTC

- reply

Brigading was an issue and so was suppression of divergent opinions. I think by filtering and ranking things based on my WoT I fix both:
If crypto-bros invade my bitcoin sub with whatever spam, my client will sort them all the way down because my follows are not crypto-bros. I would still see them but I could also filter them based on my WoT's down-votes.
If I post on a personal finance sub about bitcoin, my follows will see it and so will those inclined to explore beyond their own follows.

2026-02-01 18:10:09 UTC

- reply

The mod system made it controversial though. r/bitcoin got so much heat over censorship.
What I want in a nostr client is that mechanism that shows top posts not chronologically but by some up-votes divided by time since post. This of course would give huge important to who can up-vote and I would not trust any up-vote outside my WoT. Give full weight to my direct follows and their follows should have their votes scaled by the number of those votes. So if my follows voted 12 times last hour and their follows 24 times, give their votes only 50% weight etc.

2026-02-01 18:03:35 UTC

- reply

It's not an issue with the protocol nostr at all! I'm convinced we will build what we need on nostr.
"Social media" is a term for a very broad range of products, including tiktok, instagram and reddit. I just see those clients on a scale with regards on how much they focus on the author and the most successful clients on nostr so far were ones that totally focus on the author and not the message.
Relay-based topic filtering in my opinion is against the spirit of nostr. By locking a topic into one relay you make it more censorable. Of course you could have multiple cigar relays but for me, relays are the ether through which we deliver our notes to the world broadcast-style and the recipient should then decide if he wants to receive my events or not.

2026-02-01 17:58:09 UTC

- reply

I don't want relays to have that power. I want my events to always be on enough relays such that they all remain persisted and available. Moderation in nostr should happen on the edges.

2026-02-01 17:55:54 UTC

- reply

How is nostr better than Xitter? It's a protocol and not owned by some central entity or person. No central algorithm pushing for one narrative or another. In principle. Did you read my post?

2026-02-01 17:39:39 UTC

- reply

I see there are an all time total of 207 relevant events with 7 found for the last 30 days.
So kind-11 is like kind-1 but for topics clients? No nip-72 moderation? I'll give it a try but I see it's early days. nip-72 is dead?

2026-02-01 17:20:49 UTC

- reply

Kind-11? What happened with nip-72?

2026-02-01 17:17:22 UTC

- reply

I think they exist. Or ... they did exist. nip-72 appears to be on life support though. Or is Jumble giving it another shot? I see a new reply just popped in:
#nevent1q…gq3a

2026-02-01 16:53:47 UTC

- reply

I would worry about relays being too permissive to low-signal authors and bots. But then again, if it's about ideas, bots should be totally ok, too. Hmmm...
But still, I would worry about bots augmenting signal. I wouldn't want bots to up-vote ideas. The surfacing of good ideas should happen by my peers. By my follows.

2026-02-01 16:34:13 UTC

- reply

I wonder who's **not** in the Epstein files 🤪

2026-02-01 16:30:54 UTC

Nostr is better than Xitter, but it still favors narcissism over merit.
V4V doesn't reward the best builders, it rewards the best salesmen.
There is no centralized algorithm pushing a narrative from a continuum of a billion options, but neither is there a defense against constructed consent. The protocol can't stop the manufacturing of "hero figures" because we are biologically wired to seek leaders and follow them.
I liked Reddit because it was about ideas, not people. You followed a topic and the design almost hid the author. This gave a sense of "Message, not messenger". Nostr is the opposite. It is entirely messenger-centric. This is evidenced by the flood of "GM" and "GN" posts, which would be completely void of value if it wasn't about who was posting them.
How could we nudge Nostr away from this? Some clients allow you to hide authors, but that is just self-constraint. I think we need a protocol layer that constrains participants to focus on ideas but without getting drowned by AI slop.
How would a "late reveal" of authorship work? Authors could prove group membership - being one of my follows and only after a week or so reveal their identity.
Fundamentally I wonder if people want to be heard for who they are, or for what they say? Do I want to be famous, or do I want my ideas to be recognized? I think the latter comes first. We want to be recognized as authors of great ideas.

2026-02-01 15:39:48 UTC

- reply

I try to get friends and family into Bitcoin but I would stay the hell away from doing this too aggressively.
To leverage friends and family against Bitcoin is complete madness.

2026-02-01 15:19:59 UTC

- reply

Any ideas when it will be ready? This repo doesn't look right. No updated branches in 2 months?
https://i.nostr.build/F8bIhyB4VF8msAQf.png

2026-02-01 15:13:20 UTC

- reply

Keychat is an app. It supports protocols and is open source but which other apps are compatible?
To my understanding, WN explored signal and MLS, too and decided to go with more advanced tools to be able to rotate users in and out of group chats while group chats can scale to thousands of users, which would not be practical in Signal.
WN so far is "only an app", too but the devs are working on dev kits for integration in other apps right now. It remains to be seen if Marmot will get picked up by other nostr clients but the feature claims look awesome.

2026-02-01 15:05:03 UTC

- reply

I have no idea how identity works in WN/Marmot.
I want to find others' identities starting with my npub's follows lists.
I assumed I'd have to share my WN npub - my WN identity - on my nostr profiles so others can chat me.

2026-01-31 17:12:26 UTC

- reply

Are these "leaks" contaminated by wild fabrications?

2026-01-31 17:09:51 UTC

- reply

Confirming IRGC membership over 10k is weird assuming he didn't trust sharing the membership card by email. Why not shut the fuck up about this incriminating material and keep it exclusive to TG?

2026-01-31 16:38:18 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…g2cs

2026-01-31 16:37:58 UTC

- reply

You get into serious trouble if you hire and pay Iranian developers so I assume, Pomp is in jail by now?

2026-01-31 15:23:26 UTC

- reply

That signals that WN isn't ready yet. I thought it would work already? Why not replace Signal with WN for the core group?
How do I find that Signal group.
Regarding "Thread Model": Signal to me feels weird. On the one hand it should be more private than WhatsApp and certainly Telegram but on the other hand, it's centralized and I can't just use an alternative client that doesn't need to update twice a week? WTF? Feels fishy. For the development of FOSS I'd rather choose Telegram as it has web clients and people wouldn't expect privacy that probably isn't provided by Signal neither.

2026-01-31 15:17:04 UTC

- reply

Those relays are the default - same here.
Great to hear that MDK is high priority. We need this to be a protocol, not just an app. Stand-alone Signal and Telegram competitors might evolve but the more complete nostr clients should also allow me to participate for critical mass.

2026-01-31 15:13:56 UTC

- reply

I need it integrated with where I have my other contacts. For example in @nprofile…twc2 @nprofile…q53l @nprofile…vnm5 ... so I can start a chat with my follows. But as a fallback, WhiteNoise could take my npub to show me relevant follows to chat to but then I'd still not have their WhiteNoise npubs, so WhiteNoise npubs would need to be in our nostr profiles? Some way to chat @nprofile…g2cl would be that he has his WhiteNoise npub in his public profile and my npub in WhiteNoise would discover that, so I could initiate a chat with him. At that point, my WN npub wouldn't be authenticated as Leo, so Max would not trust my chat much. He could ask me to either nostr-DM him from my other account to confirm my identity or to store my WN npub with my public profile.

2026-01-31 15:05:49 UTC

- reply

I'm absolutely fascinated about the potential going by the unique features of anonymity Max is promoting. But it should be more than an app and for that, we need this reference implementation to work a bit better. Once it takes off, other nostr apps will follow. But for that, good SDKs will be needed, too.

2026-01-31 15:00:03 UTC

- reply

I waited for the next version a while now :D
I listened to a podcast with Max and it sounded fantastic! But we need discoverability.

2026-01-31 14:54:45 UTC

- reply

That's like worst case: The app asks for your "nsec" but other than having leaked your nsec to yet another app that now can rug you (on purpose or by accident), you don't even get anything in return. A bit like those pages that ask your contact details and CC number before telling you the product is out of stock.

2026-01-31 14:29:35 UTC

Who's whitenoising?
It's a bit cumbersome to bootstrap. Either I put my nsec into the app or I won't find my follows?
It would be nice if I could provide my npub [email protected] to find relevant others.

2026-01-31 14:01:07 UTC

- reply

Reach out. I'm pretty sure they are right now very interested in it being uncensorable. And as long as they are not yet building for an exit strategy, you might convince them.

2026-01-30 22:30:35 UTC

When I thought about the AI apocalypse ten years ago, I thought we'd be fine as long as the AI doesn't get internet access.
Now it gets millions of root servers, credit cards, bitcoins, ... to play with.
Are we dangerous?

2026-01-30 21:40:17 UTC

- reply

Files show Epstein referring to such an event. Can somebody ask Gates?

2026-01-30 21:38:50 UTC

- reply

Reding the letter ... Like WTF?

2026-01-29 19:33:34 UTC

- reply

Now https://yakihonne.com/note/nevent1qqsxa968w36cew63vlj355cv3jm82yq2nhphnk4fm2hj2f9q5wqpnlgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgst5teefqektpr4aytgpwyclxlq78v9q9nvd2pem0sgf5pxdttwyzsrqsqqqqqpmv9h9z does load but the event embedding above still does not load. What's so special about that event?

2026-01-29 19:29:45 UTC

- reply

Hmm ... @nprofile…twc2 any idea? That referenced event is not loading for me. It's a great interview and on Amethyst I see it has no interaction or did @nprofile…w5ad "delete" it?
Lack of consistency in nostr tingles my paranoia ...

2026-01-29 19:26:56 UTC

Why do I see this on Amethyst and not on Yakihonne? I even re-broadcast it.
#nevent1q…9h9z

2026-01-29 17:42:45 UTC

- reply

Should I get a fiat job to buy Bitcoin? 🤔

2026-01-29 02:18:02 UTC

- reply

There is a spot in the backyard that won’t drain
It gathers water from the sprinklers and the rain
When it gets deep I take the kids out stomping mud
I’d rather have the giggles than a bud.

2026-01-28 20:18:30 UTC

- reply

Guess I should try out more tools, not only many LLMs.
I used cline with opus4.5 but it runs into context limits fast. So Sonnet it is mostly.

2026-01-28 18:42:27 UTC

- reply

As you clearly won the status game - I wasn't quoted by MSM today - I guess I "failed". Doesn't mean you are right to dunk on @nprofile…lsjd without getting challenged. Your clearly higher status doesn't mean all you say is right or true. But keep going, you're good at this! Maybe at some point you'll get a "like" for your status thing you have going on there.

2026-01-28 18:25:49 UTC

- reply

Sorry! Can't hear you! Your horse is too high!

2026-01-28 18:18:08 UTC

- reply

My "protest" is about your OP rubbing me the wrong way. Get off your high horse.

2026-01-28 17:39:22 UTC

- reply

You went out of your way to dunk on nprofile1qqsdxpmyx4rhqdfhml00sywrm65k78u7snyzf83qqdf5ykfy4xgge7q28lsjd's life choice to build outside the system - to be sovereign. He's not trying to get away from others as you imply. He should speak for himself but my guess is he wants to get away from rent-seeking parasites but be close with those around him.

2026-01-28 17:24:52 UTC

Vibe coding is controversial. @nprofile…5cp7 claims to code features as fast as he can think of them with the same quality as hand-coded and others claim to be slower vibe coding than hand coding stuff.
The truth is probably in between and my experience is that it's easier to get going on a challenging task but ultimately it's a lot of cleaning up after the AI, so maybe I'm faster cause I get started at all but then, cleaning up after the AI costs a lot of effort and often results in me abandoning tasks.
That said, the very near future will probably be "coding as fast as I can come up with features". Maybe it's only missing a context window big enough to grasp the entirety of the project to hook the feature in where it belongs and use the tools that are already implemented ... or at least use the programming languages already used in the project. But I suspect, a bit more than token count will be needed but it will come within a year or two.

2026-01-28 16:07:27 UTC

- reply

For me it was always like this: 90% of the progress happened in 10% of the time and the rest was running against walls, knowing that at some point I would manage to break through. Sure, the banging against walls experience was repetitive but it was never mechanically repetitive. It was always searching google, asking on stackoverflow and often the right question led to the answer.

2026-01-28 15:50:24 UTC

- reply

"nodes running" isn't "people running nodes" but of course you want your viewers to believe this. 1300 nodes could easily just be one person.

2026-01-28 14:25:53 UTC

- reply

Nothing repetitive about being a dev. Pre LLMs, 90% of the time was spent researching problems and I'm not sure that changed much.